PENYELENGGARAAN GOOD GOVERNANCE DI DESA SEA KECAMATAN PINELENG KABUPATEN MINAHASA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This research there are problems in implementing Good Governance at the village of Sea, have not gone well
according law No. 8 of 1999 on the implementation of good governance. The researchers used a qualitative research
method. The data was collected starting from the stage of observation, in-depth interviews and documentation. On
the data collection was completed by using the guidelines of the interview, where there are 10 informants
interviewed.
After being interviewed, the researchers analyzed the results of interviews with several phases. The first of them
with the data collection was done through observation or interviews, then do record keeping and typing and editing
as necessary, both the reduction i.e. elections against existing data, sharpen data analysis, summarize and discard
data that is not needed, the third provides data and simplifying data have been obtained in order to facilitate research
in the conclusion, the fourth withdrawal i.e., verify their conclusions with a review the records or data retrieved as
well as analyze causal including brainstorm with friends and supervising professors and take conclusion.
The results showed that organizing Good Governance have not applied optimally as expected by law No. 8 in 1999
and the theory of Inu Kencana, 1994.
The conclusion that can be drawn through the results of this research is that found there are some principles of Good
Governance that has not gone well. Of which public participation is still very lacking in the process management of
the KTP & KK, law enforcement has been running fine but for the better should the existence of PERDES,
transparency needs to be improved in terms of disclosure for financial management to the community. Responsifitas
the Government is still lacking in terms of service the rice still need for renewing the data community who deserve
the rice, RKPdesa village and Profile updates need to be made in accordance with the year 2016, the lack of a
Government response, information boards, still less to embrace the community in order to make KK and ID CARD.
Consensus is already well underway, however, Equality with regard to note what's special in service of rice, the
Government should give the rights of the underprivileged community, lest not right on target, effectiveness and
efficiency can not be rated good because there are problems that have been described above so that the community
can be felt yet. Accountability has been running good since the village was already running task for reporting to the
District about financial management and already inform the community about the program that will be implemented.
With this research is expected to be the subject of study of the theory of society and contribute as well as input for
the Government in realizing Good Governance effectively and efficiently.
Key Words: Good Governance
This research there are problems in implementing Good Governance at the village of Sea, have not gone well
according law No. 8 of 1999 on the implementation of good governance. The researchers used a qualitative research
method. The data was collected starting from the stage of observation, in-depth interviews and documentation. On
the data collection was completed by using the guidelines of the interview, where there are 10 informants
interviewed.
After being interviewed, the researchers analyzed the results of interviews with several phases. The first of them
with the data collection was done through observation or interviews, then do record keeping and typing and editing
as necessary, both the reduction i.e. elections against existing data, sharpen data analysis, summarize and discard
data that is not needed, the third provides data and simplifying data have been obtained in order to facilitate research
in the conclusion, the fourth withdrawal i.e., verify their conclusions with a review the records or data retrieved as
well as analyze causal including brainstorm with friends and supervising professors and take conclusion.
The results showed that organizing Good Governance have not applied optimally as expected by law No. 8 in 1999
and the theory of Inu Kencana, 1994.
The conclusion that can be drawn through the results of this research is that found there are some principles of Good
Governance that has not gone well. Of which public participation is still very lacking in the process management of
the KTP & KK, law enforcement has been running fine but for the better should the existence of PERDES,
transparency needs to be improved in terms of disclosure for financial management to the community. Responsifitas
the Government is still lacking in terms of service the rice still need for renewing the data community who deserve
the rice, RKPdesa village and Profile updates need to be made in accordance with the year 2016, the lack of a
Government response, information boards, still less to embrace the community in order to make KK and ID CARD.
Consensus is already well underway, however, Equality with regard to note what's special in service of rice, the
Government should give the rights of the underprivileged community, lest not right on target, effectiveness and
efficiency can not be rated good because there are problems that have been described above so that the community
can be felt yet. Accountability has been running good since the village was already running task for reporting to the
District about financial management and already inform the community about the program that will be implemented.
With this research is expected to be the subject of study of the theory of society and contribute as well as input for
the Government in realizing Good Governance effectively and efficiently.
Key Words: Good Governance
Full Text:
PDFRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Diterbitkan oleh :
Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado
Editorial Office :
Jl. Kampus Unsrat Bahu, Malalayang - Manado 95115
Phone: +6281295145441