Analisis produktivitas alat penangkapan gurita yang dioperasikan menggunakan umpan tiruan: Productivity analysis of octopus fishing gear operated using artificial bait

Ayu Suciati; Muhammad Kurnia; M. Abduh Ibnu Hajar; Alfa Filep Petrus Nelwan; Ilham Jaya; Najamuddin Najamuddin

doi:10.35800/jitpt.9.1.2024.55989

Authors

Ayu Suciati Fakultas Ilmu Kelautan dan Perikanan Unhas Makassar
Muhammad Kurnia Fakultas Ilmu Kelautan dan Perikanan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-0581
M. Abduh Ibnu Hajar Fakultas Ilmu Kelautan dan Perikanan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-1505
Alfa Filep Petrus Nelwan Fakultas Ilmu Kelautan dan Perikanan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5979-9086
Ilham Jaya Fakultas Ilmu Kelautan dan Perikanan https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6001-2093
Najamuddin Najamuddin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4737-0781

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35800/jitpt.9.1.2024.55989

Keywords:

Productivity, Octopus Fishing, Artificial Lures.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to ascertain the differences in catches of octopus fishing, as well as to determine the productivity of octopus fishing gear using bole-bole and pocong-pocong. This research was conducted in October and November 2023 in the waters of Langkai Island and Lanjukang Island, Makassar City. The methodology employed in this research is a case study. Primary data were collected directly by following, recording, and identifying the number of catches, the size of the catch, and the length of time to operate the fishing gear. The data were then analysed using the T-test to determine the difference in catches on octopus fishing rods using bole-bole and pocong-pocong. The results of the study during 31 trips yielded a total of 92 fish. The catch of pocong-pocong is more likely to result in the capture of an octopus, with a value of 59% of octopus caught compared to bole-bole, which is 41% of the total hauling of 218 times. The pocong-pocong had a higher productivity with an average value of 57.81 grams per minute compared to bole-bole with an average value of 47.29 grams per minute during 31 fishing trips. The results of the statistical analysis using the T-test demonstrated that there were differences in the catches between the two fishing gears. The pocong-pocong had a higher catch than bole-bole.

References

Baskoro, M. Didit, E.W. Kushartono, dan I.Irwani. 2019. “Model Pertumbuhan dan Status Sumberdaya Panulirus homarus Di Cilacap, Jawa Tengah.” Journal of Marine Research 8(1):85–93.

Bubun, Rita L., dan Amir Mahmud. 2019. “Teknologi penangkapan pocong-pocong untuk gurita di kecamatan kabaena barat sulawesi tenggara.” MarineFisheries 10(1):23–32.

Budiyanto, A. dan Herri, S. 1997. “Catatan mengenai si tangan delapan (gurita/octopus spp).” Oseana XXII:25–33.

Fakhira, K., Pramonowibowo, dan Asriyanto. 2014. “Pengaruh perbedaan bentuk dan warna umpan tiruan terhadap hasil tangkapan gurita pada alat tangkap pancing ulur di perairan Baros, Gunung Kidul.” Journal of Fisheries Resources Utilization Management and Technology 3:275–83.

Gestal, C., Santiago, P., Ángel G., Graziano, F., dan Juan M. Vieites Editors. 2019. Handbook of Pathogens and Diseases in Cephalopods. disunting oleh C. Gestal, S. Pascual, A. Guerra, G. Fiorito, dan J. M. Vieites.

Guard, M., dan Y.D. Mgaya. 2002a. “The artisanal fishery for Octopus cyanea Gray in Tanzania.” Hlm. 528–536 dalam Ambio. Vol. 31. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

Herwig, Jade N., Martial, D., J.D. Roberts, J.M. Semmens, M.Gagliano, dan Andrew J.H., 2012. “Using age-based life history data to investigate the life cycle and vulnerability of octopus cyanea.” PLoS ONE 7(8).

Jerep, p, CFE, Roper, MD, Norman, K. Julian, dan Fin. 2014. “Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of cephalopod species known to date. Volume 3. Octopods and Vampire Squids.” 3.

Kurniawan, K., Lefrand, M., Fanny, S., Alfret L. dan M.S. Sompie. 2019. “Studi pengaruh perbedaan warna umpan buatan pancing gurita terhadap hasil tangkapan.” Jurnal ilmu dan teknologi perikanan tangkap 4(2):69–74.

Mahonas, J., M.Zaini, H.Santoso, dan M.Z.Arifin. 2017. “Alat tangkap pancing gurita.” Buletin Matric 14(2).

Manohas, J., R.Saranga, M.Zaini, dan M.Z. Arifin. 2020. “Pengaruh Perbedaan Model dan Bentuk Pancing Terhadap Hasil Tangkapan Gurita.” Jurnal Bluefin Fisheries 2(2):43–53.

Minggo, Yohanes D. B. R., Christofel O. Nobel Pale, dan Nurlaila. 2023. “Perbandingan hasil tangkapan gurita (Octopus sp) dengan menggunakan umpan buatan yang berbeda (pocong dan kepiting) di desa nanghale kabupaten sikka.” Jurnal Ilmu Kelautan dan Perikanan 05(02).

Musbir, A.Mallawa, Sudirman, dan Najamuddin. 2006. “Pendugaan ukuran pertama kali matang gonad ikan kembung rasterlliger kanagurta di perairan laut flores.” Jurnal sains dan teknologi 6(1):19–26.

Nelwan, Alfa FP, Sudirman, M.Zainuddin, dan M.Kurnia. 2015. “Produktivitas penangkapan ikan pelagis besar menggunakan pancing ulur yang berpangkalan di kabupaten majene.” Marine Fisheries 6(2):129–42.

Nurdiansyah, L., Pramonowibowo, dan A.D.P. Fitri. 2015a. “Analisis perbedaan jenis umpan terhadap hasi ltangkapan pada pancing gurita (jigger) di perairan karimunjawa, jawa tengah.” Journal of Fisheries Resources Utilization Management and Technology 4(4):157–163.

Oliveira, A.R., Andreia, S.S., Paul L., R. Andrews, D.Green, G.M. Cooke, S.Hall, K.Blackburn, dan A.V. Sykes. 2020. “Microplastics presence in cultured and wild-caught cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.” Marine Pollution Bulletin 160. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111553.

Paruntu, Carolus P., Farnis B.B, dan Sujito L. T., 2009. “Gurita (cephalopoda) dari Perairan Sangihe, Sulawesi Utara.” EKOTON 9:13–27.

Safari, H., ParengRengi, dan A.Brown. 2012. Fishing technology studies at octopus bubu nagalawan sei serdang district perbaungan bedagai north sumatra province. Pekanbaru.

Selpiana, M.Karim, dan W.Kantun. 2021. “Pengembangan Perikanan dan Pemasaran Gurita (Octopus sp) di Makassar Sulawesi Selatan, Fisheries and Marketing Development of Octopus sp in Makassar, South Sulawesi.” SIGANUS: Jou. of Fisheries and Marine Science 3(1).

Siregar, S. 2017. Statistika terapan untuk perguruan tinggi. 1 ed. Jakarta: Kencana.

Statistik Perikanan Tangkap. 2022. “Produksi Laut Tahunan menurut Jenis Ikan dan Kabupaten, Tahun 2018-2022.”

Sujarweni, Wiratna. 2016. Kupas tuntas penelitian akutansi dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Putaka baru press.

Toha, A.H., A., Jeni, N.Widodo, L.Hakim, dan Sutiman B.S. 2015. “Gurita Octopus Cyanea Raja Ampat.” Konservasi Biodiversitas Raja 4 Lindungi Ragam, Lestari Indonesia 4(8).

Wood, J. B., E. Kenchington, dan R. K. O’Dor. 1998. “Reproduction and embryonic development time of Bathypolypus arcticus, a deep-sea octopod (Cephalopoda: Octopoda).” MALACOLOGIA 39(1–2):11–19.

Yayasan Konservasi Laut Indonesia. 2021. “Profil perikanan gurita pulau langkai dan pulau lanjukang kota makassar, sulawesi selatan.”

Zaini, M., J.Manohas, Y.Purwanto, dan Johnny, H.T. 2020. “Pengaruh perbedaan warna umpan buatan pada pancing gurita terhadap hasil tangkapan.” Jurnal Bluefin Fisheries 2(2):33–42.