Eksplorasi dimensi spiritual dalam praktik pelaporan akuntansi sosial dan lingkungan di Bali
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32400/iaj.27990Keywords:
social and environmental accounting, Tri Hita Karana, corporate social responsibility, sustainability, spiritualityAbstract
Social and environmental accounting has attracted growing attention from companies in Indonesia as these companies face an increasing pressure to report their social and environmental responsibilities to the public. Despite this trend, however, Indonesia lacks a social and environmental reporting model that is relevant to its business environment, i.e., a model that incorporates the spiritual dimension, and not merely the economics, social, and environmental dimensions. The main aim of this study was to explore the spiritual dimension of the social and environmental reporting practices of a tourism company in Bali. The exploration was based on Tri Hita Karana, a local societal value held by the people of Bali. This study employed a two-phase research approach, where the first phase focused on exploring the social and environmental reporting practices of the company, while the second phase centered on refining and assessing the applicability of this reporting model in other companies. The results of this study show that the appropriate model of social and environmental accounting for Indonesian companies should consist of four dimensions: economic, environmental, social, and spiritual. Among these dimensions, the implementation of the spiritual dimension in social and environmental accounting faces the greatest challenges.References
Agudelo, M. A. L., Johannsdottir, L., & Davidsdottir, B. (2019). Drivers that motivate energy companies to be responsible: A systematic literature review of corporate social responsibility in the energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119094
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
Allen, B. G. (2014). What’s new about New accounts? Assessing change proposals for social and environmental accounting. Accounting Forum, 38(4), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2014.03.001
Amidjaya, P. G., & Widagdo, A. K. (2019). Sustainability reporting in Indonesian listed banks: Do corporate governance, ownership structure and digital banking matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Forthcomin. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-09-2018-0149
Baldarelli, M.-G., Baldo, M. Del, & Nesheva-Kiosseva, N. (2017). Environmental Accounting and Reporting: Theory and Practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Brown, J., & Tregidga, H. (2017). Re-politicizing social and environmental accounting through Rancière: On the value of dissensus. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 61, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.002
Çelik, T., Arayici, Y., & Budayan, C. (2019). Assessing the social cost of housing projects on the built environment: Analysis and monetization of the adverse impacts incurred on the neighbouring communities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 77, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.03.001
Chawla, V. (2016). Workplace spirituality governance: impact on customer orientation and salesperson performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(4), 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-08-2014-0153
Chen, C., Vanclay, F., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The social impacts of a stop-start transnational university campus: How the impact history and changing plans of projects affect local communities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 77, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.04.004
Chowdhary, P., Raj, A., & Bharagava, R. N. (2018). Environmental pollution and health hazards from distillery wastewater and treatment approaches to combat the environmental threats: A review. Chemosphere, 194, 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.163
Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132
Deegan, C. (2017). Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives of Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.005
Dillard, J., Yuthas, K., & Baudot, L. (2016). Dialogic framing of accounting information systems in social and environmental accounting domains: Lessons from, and for, microfinance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 23, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.10.001
Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B., & Schlosberg, D. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford University Press.
Foote, J., Gaffney, N., & Evans, J. R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Implications for performance excellence. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 21(8), 799–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.487660
Foster, S., & Foster, A. (2019). The impact of workplace spirituality on work-based learners : Individual and organisational level perspectives. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 11(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-06-2019-0015
Gallego-Ãlvarez, I., Lozano, M. B., & RodrÃguez-Rosa, M. (2018). An analysis of the environmental information in international companies according to the new GRI standards. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.240
Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006
Isaksson, L., Kiessling, T., & Harvey, M. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Why bother? Organizational Dynamics, 43(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.10.008
Jamali, D., & Sdiani, Y. (2013). Does religiosity determine affinities to CSR? Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion, 10(4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2013.802251
Jones, M. J. (2011). The nature, use and impression management of graphs in social and environmental accounting. Accounting Forum, 35(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2011.03.002
Krishnakumar, S., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The “whatâ€, “why†and “how†of spirituality in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940210423060
Kurt, Y., Yamin, M., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2016). Spirituality as an antecedent of trust and network commitment: The case of Anatolian Tigers. European Management Journal, 34(6), 686–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.011
Lehman, G. (2017). The language of environmental and social accounting research: The expression of beauty and truth. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 44, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.11.005
McGuire, S. T., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2012). The impact of religion on financial reporting irregularities. Accounting Review, 87(2), 645–673. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10206
Milliman, J., Gatling, A., & Kim, J. (Sunny). (2018). The effect of workplace spirituality on hospitality employee engagement, intention to stay, and service delivery. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 35, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.03.002
Moura-Leite, R. C., & Padgett, R. C. (2011). Historical background of corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(4), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/1747111111117511
Muniapan, B., & Satpathy, B. (2013). The “dharma†and “karma†of CSR from the Bhagavad-Gita. Journal of Human Values, 19(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0971685813492265
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Essex, Inggris: Pearson.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Poulton, E., & Barnes, L. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: An examination of business students’ perceptions of spirituality. International Review of Business Research Papers, 8(4), 144–156. https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/uon:23568
Roth, D., & Sedana, G. (2015). Reframing Tri Hita Karana: From ‘balinese culture’ to politics. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 16(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2014.994674
Rotondo, F., Corsi, K., & Giovanelli, L. (2019). The social side of sustainable business models: An explorative analysis of the low-cost airline industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 806–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.345
Simnett, R. (2012). Assurance of sustainability reports: Revision of ISAE 3000 and associated research opportunities. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408021211223570
Soobaroyen, T., & Ntim, C. G. (2013). Social and environmental accounting as symbolic and substantive means of legitimation: The case of HIV/AIDS reporting in South Africa. Accounting Forum, 37(2), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.04.002
Suhardana, K. M. (2006). Pengantar Etika dan Moralitas Hindu. Surabaya: Paramita.
Vasilescu, R., Barna, C., Epure, M., & Baicu, C. (2010). Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4177–4182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.660
Weinberg, F. J., & Locander, W. B. (2014). Advancing workplace spiritual development: A dyadic mentoring approach. Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.009
Weinzimmer, L. G., & Esken, C. A. (2016). Risky business: Taking a stand on social issues. Business Horizons, 59(3), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.01.007
Wiana, I. K. (2004). Mengapa Bali Disebut Bali? Surabaya: Paramita.
Wiana, I. K. (2007). Tri Hita Karana Menurut Konsep Hindu. Surabaya: Paramita.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford, Inggris: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
The articles published in Indonesia Accounting Journal are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License with authors as copyright holders.
Â
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Â
Under this license then authors free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms :
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.