Penggunaan Metode Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Pada Pengaruh Kemampuan Kerja dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan serta dampaknya Terhadap Kualitas Layanan Administrasi Pendidikan di Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Bina Insan

Authors

  • Surajiyo Surajiyo Universitas Bina Insan
  • Nasruddin Nasruddin
  • Nosi Fanira
  • Herman Paleni

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35794/jmbi.v8i3.36015

Abstract

This study aims to obtain results about the effect of work ability on employee performance, motivation on employee performance, work ability on service quality, motivation on service quality, work ability on service quality through performance, and motivation on service quality through performance in the Undergraduate Education Program. (S1) Faculty of Economics and Business Management and Accounting Study Program, with a total population of students who are active in the Even Semester of the Academic Year 2020/2021 as many as 1148 students. The number of samples taken using the Slovin formula and an error rate of 5% (0.05), obtained a sample of 297 students. The distribution of the questionnaires was carried out offline and online (google form).

Stages of research by conducting observations, grouping observational data, searching references/literatures, making frameworks and hypotheses, determining data collection techniques, making research instruments or questionnaires, distributing questionnaires both offline and online (google form), analyzing data using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with a computer tool Lisrel 8.70 program. The steps of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) carried out by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), model identification, and Modification of the Model as well as the Goodness of Fit Index.

The results showed that the coefficient of the effect of work ability on performance was 0.68, and the t-count value was 7.91. Because the value of t arithmetic is 7.91 > 1.96, then work ability has a significant effect on employee performance. Thus, it can be interpreted that the higher the work ability, the higher the employee's performance. The value of the coefficient of the influence of motivation on performance is 0.20, and the t value is 2.87. Because the t value is 2.87 > 1.96, motivation has a significant effect on employee performance. Thus, it can be interpreted that the higher the motivation, the higher the employee's performance. The coefficient value of the effect of work ability on service quality is 0.82, and the t-count value is 8.62. Because the value of t count is 8.62 > 1.96, the work ability has a significant effect on service quality. Thus, it can be interpreted that the higher the work ability, the higher the service quality. The value of the coefficient of the influence of motivation on service quality is 0.16, and the t-count value is 2.45. Because the value of t count is 2.45 > 1.96, then the effect of motivation on service quality is significant. Thus, it can be interpreted that the higher the motivation, the higher the service quality. The coefficient value of the effect of performance on service quality is 0.46, and the t-count value is 5.72. Because the t value is 5.72 > 1.96, the direct effect of performance on service quality is significant. Thus, it can be interpreted that the higher the performance, the higher the service quality. The value of the coefficient of the effect of work ability on service quality through performance can be seen from the magnitude of the indirect effect of work ability on service quality through performance of 0.32 with a t value of 8.62 > 1.96. This shows that motivation is able to be a mediating variable by 32% for the relationship between work ability and service quality. While the value of the coefficient of the influence of motivation on service quality through performance can be seen from the magnitude of the indirect effect of motivation on service quality through performance of 0.08 with a t value of 2.45 > 1.96. This shows that performance is able to be a mediating variable of 8% for the relationship between motivation and service quality

 

Keywords: Work Ability, Motivation, Performance, Service Quality

References

Afifah, N. (2014). Pengaruh Kemampuan Kerja Pegawai, Etos Kerja Dan Semangat Kerja Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Di Kantor Kecamatan Sale Kabupaten Rembang. Economic Education Analysis Journal .

Algifari. (2016). Mengukur Kualitas Layanan dengan dengan Indeks Kepuasan, Metode Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) dan Model Kano. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Anidar, S. I. (2015). Pengaruh Kemampuan Dan Komitmen Terhadap Motivasi Dan Kinerja Pegawai Pada Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Natuna. Jurnal Tepak Manajemen Bisnis .

Chair, H. d. (2018). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Perguruan Tinggi Di Kabupaten Maros). Bongaya Journal for Research in Management .

Deddy, M. (2015). Perilaku Organisasi dan Kepemimpinan Pelayanan (Konsep dan Aplikasi Administrasi Manajemen dan Organisasi Modern). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Emron, E. Y. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Gunarto, M. (2019). Analisis Statistika dengan Model Persamaan Struktural (SEM), Teoritis dan Praktis. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Hanggraini. (2012). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: LPFE UI.

Haryono, S. (2016). Metode SEM untuk Penelitian Manajemen dengan AMOS, Lisrel, PLS. Jakarta: Intermedia Personalia Utama.

Hasibuan, M. (2016). Organisasi dan Motivasi Dasar Peningkatan Produktifitas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Karamoy, H., & Tulung, J. E. (2020). The Effect of Financial Performance and Corporate Governance To Stock Price In Non-Bank Financial Industry. Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(2), 97-103.

Mangkunegara, A. P. (2015). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia . Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mariah, U. S. (2013). Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Kinerja Pegawai Terhadap Kualitas Layanan Administrasi Akademik. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan .

Mojambo, G. A., Tulung, J. E., & Saerang, R. T. (2020). The Influence of Top Management Team (TMT) Characteristics Toward Indonesian Banks Financial Performance During the Digital Era (2014-2018). JMBI UNSRAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi)., 7(1).

Muazansyah, I. (2018). Pengaruh kemampuan Kerja (Work Ability) dan Kualitas Kerja (Work Quality) Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Dinas Sosial Kabupaten Bangkalan. Jurnal Aplikasi Administrasi .

Rahma, I. W. (2017). Pengaruh Kemampuan Kerja Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Kabupaten Soppeng. Jurnal Mirai Management .

Riadi, E. (2018). Statistik SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) dengan Lisrel. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Selviasari, R. (2019). The Effect Of Situational Leadership Style, Compensation and Motivation On Employee Performance In PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk. Kediri Branch. Journal of Egineering and Management in Industrial System .

Sinambela, P. L. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Membangun Tim Kerja yang Solid untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujiati. (2017). The Effect Of Motivation And Competence On Employee Performance In Satellite Technology Center-National Institute Aeronautics And Space. Journal of Applied Management (JAM) .

Supriyanto. (2011). Pengaruh Kemampuan Dan Motivasi Kerja Dosen Terhadap Kualitas Layanan Kepada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis.

Suryanto, S. (2018). Competence and Discipline on Work Motivation and The Implication on Working Performance. European Research Studies Journal .

Sutrisno, E. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia.

Wibowo. (2016). Manajemen Kinerja, Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-05

How to Cite

Surajiyo, S., Nasruddin, N., Fanira, N., & Paleni, H. (2021). Penggunaan Metode Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Pada Pengaruh Kemampuan Kerja dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan serta dampaknya Terhadap Kualitas Layanan Administrasi Pendidikan di Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Bina Insan. JMBI UNSRAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis Dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi)., 8(3). https://doi.org/10.35794/jmbi.v8i3.36015