IPTEKS OPINI BPK TERHADAP LAPORAN KEUANGAN PEMERINTAH PUSAT TAHUN 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32400/jiam.2.02.2018.21754Abstract
This study aim’s to analyze and provide a description of the provision financial audit agency opinion on the central government’s financial statements. The quality of financial reports that increased from the previous year made the financial statements of the central government get an unqualified opinion. The type research used is descriptive by using qualitative data types. Data sources in this study are secondary data types and in collecting and researching documents, qualitative analysis is used. The result show that the unqualified opinion. Obtained is a manifestation of transparency and accountability in the management of state finances, the government’s efforts that are carried out maximally in improving the quality of central government financial reports are very good.
Keywords : financial statement of government, statement of audit of BPK, government financial reports, unqualified opinion
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
