Kajian tentang jenis umpan buatan pancing tonda terhadap hasil tangkapan

Authors

  • Billy Jehosua Universitas Sam Ratulangi
  • Ivor L. Labaro Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado 95115
  • Lefrand Manoppo Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado 95115
  • Alfred Luasunaung Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado 95115
  • Johnny Budiman Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado 95115
  • Fanny Silooy Program Studi Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado 95115

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35800/jitpt.9.1.2024.51878

Keywords:

Fishing Rod, artificial bait, catch

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the differences between two types of artificial bait on troll line on catches and to identify the composition of catch types based on bait type. This research was carried out in Tanawangko waters and was carried out from February to March 2023 using the experimental fishing method, where two pancing tonda  each using silk fiber and chicken feather bait were operated simultaneously in one boat for 5 trips which were then analyzed using the t test. The catch during the research was 24 individuals with 3 species, namely with silk fiber bait, 20 individuals were caught consisting of 3 species and using chicken feather bait, 4 individuals were caught consisting of 2 species. The analysis results show that tcount = 1.684 < t table = 2.776; so it accepts H0 and rejects H1. This explains that the use of chicken feather bait is not significantly different from silk fiber as trolling bait for catch results. The conclusion of this research is that using silk fiber bait resulted in more catches than chicken feather bait, but the results of the t test analysis showed that the two were not significantly different and the three species of fish caught were 15 skipjack tuna (Katsuonus pelamis), 7 baby tuna (Thunnus sp.), and 2 lemadang (Coryphaena hippurus).

References

Ayodhyoa, A.U. 1981. Metode Penangkapan Ikan. Bogor. Yayasan Dewi Sri

Barat, D. K. 2016. Mengenal Alat Tangkap Pancing Tonda.

Brant A, V. 1984. Fish Catching of The word l, Edisi III. Fishing new book. Ltd. Fanham, sury, inggris.

Departemen Kelautan dan Perikanan. 2003. Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Optimalisasi Penangkapan Ikan (OPTIKAPI). Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan Tangkap. Jakarta. hal. 18.

Hermawan, M. (2016). Keberlanjutan Perikanan Tangkap Skala Kecil (Kasus Perikanan Pantai Di Serang Dan Tegal). Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Hidayat, T. 2019. Karakteristik Perikanan Pancing Tonda Di Laut Banda Characteristics Troll Line Fishery In The Banda Sea, hal. 44.

Gunarso, W. 1985. Tingkah Laku Ikan dalam Hubunganya dengan Alat, Metode dan Taktik Penangkapan. Jurusan Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Perikanan. Fakultas Perikanan. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. 149 hlm.

Nainggolan, D. C. (2007). Metode Penangkapan Ikan. Jakarta.

Nasir, M. (1985). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.

Nurchaya F, Dwi Putra, Abdul M. 2014. Monitoring Hasil Perikanan Dengan Alat Tangklap Pancing Tonda Di Pelabuhan Perikanan Nusantara Prigi, Kabupaten Trenggalek, Propinsi Jawa Timur. [ Jurnal Ilmiah Perikanan dan Kelautan ]. Vol.6 No.1, April 2014.

Sudirman 2013. Mengenal Alat dan Metode Penangkapan Ikan. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta

Subani, W. dan H.R. Barus, 1989. Alat Penangkapan Ikan dan Udang Laut di Indonesia. Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. DepartemenPertanian. Jakarta. 248 hlm.

Downloads

Published

31-01-2024

How to Cite

Jehosua, B., Labaro, I. L., Manoppo, L., Luasunaung, A., Budiman, J., & Silooy, F. (2024). Kajian tentang jenis umpan buatan pancing tonda terhadap hasil tangkapan. JURNAL ILMU DAN TEKNOLOGI PERIKANAN TANGKAP, 9(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.35800/jitpt.9.1.2024.51878

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>