Arianda Kusumaningrum; Lawrence L.J. Lumingas; Deiske A. Sumilat; Johnny Budiman; Alfret Luasunaung; Veibe Warouw

doi:10.35800/jasm.v9i2.35130

Authors

Arianda Kusumaningrum Program Studi Magister Ilmu Perairan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Jl. Kampus Unsrat Bahu, Manado 95115 Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
Lawrence L.J. Lumingas Program Studi Magister Ilmu Perairan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Jl. Kampus Unsrat Bahu, Manado 95115 Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
Deiske A. Sumilat Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Jl. Kampus Unsrat Bahu, Manado 95115, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
Johnny Budiman Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Jl. Kampus Unsrat Bahu, Manado 95115, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
Alfret Luasunaung Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Jl. Kampus Unsrat Bahu, Manado 95115, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
Veibe Warouw Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Jl. Kampus Unsrat Bahu, Manado 95115, Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35800/jasm.v9i2.35130

Keywords:

fish production, leading commodities, capture fisheries, Bitung fishing port, sustainable fisheries

Abstract

Bitung City is one of the centers of fishery production in Indonesia. Analysis of capture fisheries resources, especially at the Bitung Oceanic Fishing Port (BOFP) as a fish landing center in Bitung city, needs to be done scientifically in order to find out the need for sustainable capture fisheries. The purpose of this research is to analyze the potential of the types of superior commodities that have the opportunity to be developed. Data was collected using survey methods and in-depth interviews with fishermen and local stakeholders. Analysis of the potential of fish resources was carried out using the surplus production method. From the results of the study, it is found that there are 8 (eight) types of leading commodities in BOFP which can be developed with different potentials. They are: 1) Marlin with a sustainable potential of 159 tons, utilization rate of 44%; 2) Tongkol with sustainable potential of 10.485 tons, utilization rate is 58%; 3) Kembung with a sustainable potential of 183 tons utilization rate of 61%; 4) Big-eye tuna with sustainable potential of 111 tons utilization rate of 69%; 5) Selar with sustainable potential of 450 tons utilization rate of 85%; 6) Yellow Fin Tuna with a sustainable potential of 15.251 tons utilization rate of 86%; 7) Layang with sustainable potential of 7.152 tons utilization rate of 95%, and 8) Cakalang.

Indonesian title:Â Analisis komoditas unggulan dari sumber daya perikanan tangkap di Pelabuhan Perikanan Samudera Bitung, Sulawesi Utara

References

BEDWORTH, D.D. and BAILEY, J.E. (1987) Intregated Production, Control Systems: Management, Analysis, and Design. Singapore: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

DARONDO, F.A., MANOPPO, L. and LUASU-NAUNG, A. (2015) Komposisi tangkapan tuna hand line di Pelabuhan Perikanan Samudera Bitung, Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Perikanan Tangkap, 1 (6), pp. 227-232.

FAO (1995) Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 41 p.

FAUZI, A. (2002) Evaluasi status keberlanjutan pembangunan perikanan: aplikasi pendekatan rapfish. Jurnal Pesisir dan Lautan, 4 (3), pp. 43-45.

GIRSANG, H.S. (2008) Studi Penentuan Daerah Penangkapan Ikan Tongkol melalui Pemetaan Penyebaran Klorofil-a dan Hasil Tangkapan di Pelabuhanratu, Jawa Barat. Skripsi. Bogor: IPB.

GULLAND, J.A. (1983) Fish Stock Assessment: A manual of basic method. Chicester: John Wiley and Sons.

HUSUNA, F., RANTUNG, S.V. and KOTAMBU-NAN, O.O. (2017) Penilaian nelayan terhadap program pengembangan perikanan tangkap huhate di Kota Bitung Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Akulturasi, 5 (9), pp. 667-676.

KARYANTO, K., REPPIE, E., and BUDIMAN, J. (2015) Perbandingan hasil tangkapan tuna hand line dengan teknik pengoperasian yang berbeda di Laut Maluku. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Perikanan Tangkap, 1 (6), pp. 221-226.

NAKAMURA, H. (1969) Tuna distribution and migration. London: Fishing News (Books) Ltd, 110 Fleet Street.

NIKIJULUW, V.P.H. (2002) Rezim Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Perikanan. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Cidesindo.

PUANSALAING, D.M., BUDIMAN, J., BONEKA, F.B., MAKAPEDUA, D.M., LASUT, M.T., NGANGI, E.L.A., SUMILAT, D.A. and DARMONO, O.P. (2021) Management of scad fisheries (Decapterus spp.) in Sulawesi Sea Waters, North Sulawesi Province, using EAFM. Aquatic Science & Management, 9 (1), pp. 7-16.

SANTOSO, H., TUMANDUK, N., ONDANG, H. and SARANGA, R. (2017) Kajian morfometri dan molekuler ikan selar mata besar (Oci) dan ikan selar mata kecil (Tude) yang di daratkan di Pelabuhan Perikanan Samudera Bitung. Buletin Matric, 14 (1).

SIMBOLON, D., WIRYAWAN, B., WAHYU-NINGRUM, P.I and WAHYUDI, H. (2011) Tingkat pemanfaatan dan pola musim penangkapan ikan lemuru di perairan Selat Bali. Buletin PSP, 19 (3), pp. 293-307.

SOEMARTO (1958) Fish behavior with special reference to pelagic shoaling species: Layang (Decapterus spp.). Proceedings of the Indo-Pacific Fisheries Council, 8 (3), pp. 89-93.

SOMPIE, J. (2014) Kinerja Sektor Industri Peng-olahan Perikanan (SIPP) di Kota Bitung. Tesis. Salatiga: Program Doktor Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

TAIB, I.A.R., MANU, L. and LUASUNAUNG, A. (2018) Fluktuasi musiman cakalang (Katsuwonus pelamis): studi kasus Pelabuhan Perikanan Samudera Bitung. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Perikanan Tangkap, 3 (1), pp. 1-4.

TAMPUBOLON, S.M (1983) Ikan Tuna dan Perdagangannya. Jakarta: Gaya Baru.

WEBER, M. and DE BEAUFORT, L.F. (1931). The Fishes of the lndo-Australian Archipelago. E.J. Leiden, 6, pp. 194-201.

ZULHAM, A. (2011) Industri perikanan di Bitung. Buletin Sosek Kelautan dan Perikanan, 6 (2), pp. 53-58.