Analisis Pusat Pertumbuhan Dan Wilayah Hinterland Di Kota Samarinda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35791/agrsosek.v19i3.45749Keywords:
growth center, hinterland, scalogram, centrality index, gravityAbstract
This study aims to determine the sub-district which is the center of growth and the sub-district that is the Hinterland area to the growth center in the city of Samarinda. The research method used in this research is descriptive quantitative method. The type of data from this research is secondary data in 2021 in 10 sub-districts in Samarinda City. The variables used in this study are the number of available educational facilities, health facilities, economic facilities, facilities for places of worship, transportation facilities, population and distance from each sub-district in Samarinda City. This study also accommodates the adequacy of facilities in each sub-district in Samarinda City to see the interaction factors between regions. The analytical tools used in this research are scalogram analysis, centrality index analysis and gravity analysis. The data was processed using Microsoft Excel 2016. The results of this study indicate that the Samarinda Kota, Sungai Pinang and North Samarinda sub-districts are the sub-districts that are the center of growth in Samarinda City. Samarinda Ulu District, Samarinda Ilir District and Sungai Pinang District are hinterland areas that have the highest interaction value with sub-districts that are growth centers in Samarinda City.
References
Aguswin, A. 2020. Gravity Model dalam Place-Making Pola Interaksi Spasial di Pulau Kalimantan. Bekasi. Jurnal Pelitabangsa, 15(2), 117–132.
Alwi, M., P. Karismawan., & A. Paranata. 2020. Identifikasi Interaksi Ekonomi Sektoral Antara Kota Mataram Sebagai Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dengan Kabupaten yang Ada di Pulau Lombok Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Elastisitas-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 2(1), 20-29.
Darnilawati. 2018. Strategi Kutup Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Riau. Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sultan Syarif Kasim.
Ermawati. E. 2010. Analisis Pusat Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Pada Tingkat Kecamatan di Kabupaten Karangayar Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Surakarta. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Febriyani, R. 2014. Pengembangan Wilayah hinterland di Kecamatan kedungandang sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Pelayanan Publik. Malang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), 2(3), 440-446
Imelda. 2013. Identifikasi Pusat Pertumbuhan dan daerah Hinterland Kota Palembang. Palembang. Universitas Sriwijaya.
Irfanti, P. 2019. Analisis Penentuan Pusat Pertumbuhan dan Wilayah Hinterland dalam Pengembangan Provinsi Jawa Timur. Universitas Jember. Repository.
Nandya, A. 2016. Identifikasi Pusat Pertumbuhan dan Wilayah Hinterland di Kabupaten Sleman. Yogyakarta. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Optari, L.K. 2019. Studi Empiris Interaksi Spasial Terhadap Penentuan Pusat Pertumbuhan Dan Hinterland Pada Pengembangan Wilayah Kabupaten Asahan. Universitas Jember. Repository.
Priyadi, U., & E. Atmadji. 2017. Identifikasi Pusat Pertumbuhan dan Wilayah Hinterland di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (AJIE), 2(02), 193-219.
Rahayu, E. 2014. Penentuan pusat-pusat pertumbuhan dalam pengembangan wilayah di kabupaten Gunungkidul. Surabaya. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya.
Rustiadi, E. & J. Junaidi. 2011. Transmigrasi dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Universitas Jambi.
Utami, W. 2012. Model Pemukiman Perkotaan Berkelanjutan Pada Wilayah Bergambut di Kawasan Sungai Raya Kabupaten Kubu Raya-Provinsi Kalimantan Barat. Bogor. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright holder is the journal.Â