Effectiveness and Complications of Surgical Drainage in Pediatric Surgery: A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35790/msj.v8i2.65819Keywords:
surgical drainage; complications; effectiveness; pediatric surgeryAbstract
Abstract: The use of surgical drainage is a common adjunctive procedure in various pediatric surgeries. However, its effectiveness and associated risks remain a subject of debate, particularly due to variations in drain types, surgical techniques, and the unique characteristics of pediatric patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and complications of surgical drainage in various pediatric surgical procedures based on the most recent literature. This narrative literature review was compiled from articles published in the last 10 years (2015–2025), sourced from reputable databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCO, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving pediatric patients aged 0–18 years undergoing thoracic, abdominal, ocular, or spinal surgeries, addressing the use of surgical drainage either as a primary intervention or in comparison to non-drain approaches. A total of 20 studies were analyzed in this review. Overall, drainage proved most effective in thoracic and ocular surgeries. In thoracic surgery, devices such as the Thopaz digital drain shortened hospital stays, accelerated recovery, and reduced the number of postoperative radiographs. In ocular surgery, glaucoma drainage devices (GDD) effectively controlled intraocular pressure (IOP) and reduced the need for re-intervention. Conversely, in abdominal surgeries such as appendectomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty, as well as spinal surgeries, drainage did not confer significant clinical benefits in reducing complications or accelerating recovery. Complications in thoracic surgery included minimal risks such as prolonged air leaks and empyema; in ocular surgery, hypotony, bleb encapsulation, infection, and tube revision were most common; in abdominal surgery, complications included infection, intra-abdominal abscess, bowel obstruction, iatrogenic leaks, peritonitis, and hernia; while in spinal surgery, complications consisted of superficial infections, wound dehiscence, neurological deficits, and hematoma. In conclusion, surgical drainage is most effective in thoracic and ocular surgeries in terms of success rate, accelerated recovery, and reduced length of hospital stay. However, in abdominal and spinal surgeries, drainage offers no significant clinical benefit and carries potential risks of complications.
Keywords: surgical drainage; complications; effectiveness; pediatric surgery
References
1. Shen Y, Lin Y, Fang YF, Wu DM, He YB. Efficacy of peritoneal drainage in very-low-birth-weight neonates with Bell’s stage II necrotizing enterocolitis: A single-center retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;15(7):1416–22. Available from: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i7/1416.htm
2. Frediani S, Romano G, Pardi V, Aloi IP, Bertocchini A, Accinni A, et al. Benefits of using digital thoracic drainage systems for post-operative treatment in pediatric populations: personal experience and review of literature. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1280834. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1280834
3. Pérez-Egido L, García-Casillas MA, Simal I, Fanjul M, Cañizo A, Cerdá JA, et al. Digital thoracic drainage: a new system to monitor air leaks in pediatric population. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(4):693–5. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022346818307279
4. Ghestem T, Carolina D, Chappey B, Klein C, Haraux E. Evaluation of the K-wire technique for external urinary drainage in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Pediatri Urol. 2023;19(5): 639.e1-639.e4. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1477513123002371
5. Kaushik S, Kataria P, Raj S, Pandav SS, Ram J. Safety and efficacy of a low-cost glaucoma drainage device for refractory childhood glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(12):1623–7. Doi: https://bjo.bmj.com/ lookup/doi/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310276
6. Aneiros Castro B, Cano I, García A, Yuste P, Ferrero E, Gómez A. Abdominal drainage after laparoscopic appendectomy in children: an endless controversy? Scand J Surg. 2018;107(3):197–200. Doi: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1457496918766696
7. David VL, Ciornei B, Popoiu MC, Iacob RE, Boia ES. Is there a role for prophylactic drainage of the abdominal cavity after laparoscopic appendectomy for non-complicated appendicitis in children? J Ped Endosc Surg. 2019;1(2):71–4. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42804-019-00014-z
8. Gorter RR, Meiring S, Van Der Lee JH, Heij HA. Intervention not always necessary in post-appendectomy abscesses in children; clinical experience in a tertiary surgical centre and an overview of the literature. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175(9):1185–91. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00431-016-2756-0
9. Costa Jr ADS, Bachichi T, Holanda C, Rizzo LALMD. An initial experience with a digital drainage system during the postoperative period of pediatric thoracic surgery. J Bras Pneumol. 2016;42(6):444–6. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132016000600444&lng=en&tlng=en
10. Vasconcelos-Castro S, Borges-Dias M, Soares-Oliveira M. Digital thor acic dr ainage system: a new tool for pediatric thoracic surgery. Cardiac Thorasic aand Vascular Surgery. 2022;29(4):21-5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.213
11. Voglino V, Frediani S, Aloi IP, Pardi V, Bertocchini A, Accinni A, et al. Use of drainage after laparoscopic complicated appendectomy in children: a single-center experience. Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2024;Sep. Available from: https://www.minervamedica.it/index2.php?show=R15Y9999N00A24091903
12. Human M, Tshifularo N, Mabitsela M. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in children: Does the post-operative peritoneal drain make any difference? A prospective randomised control trial. Research Square Platform LLC. 2022 Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1563462/v1
13. Mandalos A, Sung V. Glaucoma drainage device surgery in children and adults: a comparative study of outcomes and complications. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(5):1003–11. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00417-017-3584-2
14. Nazirova ZR, Turakulova DM, Buzrukov SB. Surgical treatment of congenital glaucoma in children using Glautex drainage. Vestn oftal’mol. 2020;136(6):202. Available from: http://www.mediasphera.ru/ issues/vestnik-oftalmologii/2020/6/10042465X2020062202
15. Chen A, Yu F, Law SK, Giaconi JA, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Valved glaucoma drainage devices in pediatric glaucoma: retrospective long-term outcomes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(9):1030. Available from: http://archopht.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1856
16. Esfandiari H, Kurup SP, Torkian P, Mets MB, Rahmani B, Tanna AP. Long-term clinical outcomes of Ahmed and Baerveldt drainage device surgery for pediatric glaucoma following cataract surgery. Journal of Glaucoma. 2019;28(10):865–70. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/ IJG.0000000000001335
17. Puthuran GV, Palmberg PF, Wijesinghe HK, Pallamparthy S, Krishnadas S, Robin AL. Intermediate-term outcomes of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant in refractory paediatric glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(7):962–6. Available from: https://bjo.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314399
18. Helenius L, Gerdhem P, Ahonen M, Syvänen J, Jalkanen J, Charalampidis A, et al. Postoperative outcomes of pedicle screw instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with and without a subfascial wound drain: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Bone & Joint Journal. 2022;104-B(9):1067–72. Doi: https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/10.1302/0301-620X.104B9.BJJ-2022-0391.R1
19. Ovadia D, Drexler M, Kramer M, Herman A, Lebel DE. Closed wound subfascial suction drainage in posterior fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomized control study. Spine. 2019;44(6):377–83. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/00007632-201903150-00002
20. Kochai A, Erkorkmaz Ü. The role of drains in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: Is it necessary? Medicine 2019;98(51):e18061. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/MD.0000000000018061
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Harsali Lampus, Candy Candy, Odwin B. Saumur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors hold their copyright and grant this journal the privilege of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that permits others to impart the work with an acknowledgment of the work's origin and initial publication by this journal.
Authors can enter into separate or additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its underlying publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
