Trade Agreements and Agribusiness Export Performance: Ppml Gravity Evidence from Indonesian Palm Oil Hs 1511 (2015–2023)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35791/jat.v7i1.66783Keywords:
gravity model, comparative advantage, PPML, trade agreementsAbstract
This study examines Indonesia’s export performance in an agribusiness product at the HS 6-digit level (HS 1511) over 2015-2023 by combining revealed competitiveness indicators and structural gravity estimation. First, we compute the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) index to assess Indonesia’s export specialization relative to world trade. Second, we estimate a Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood (PPML) gravity model with year fixed effects to identify the roles of destination market size, trade costs, and trade agreement coverage. Bilateral exports are constructed from UN Comtrade, macroeconomic controls are drawn from the World Development Indicators, bilateral distance and dyadic controls are obtained from CEPII, and trade agreement status is coded from DESTA at the dyad–year level using an in-force rule. Results indicate that Indonesia retains a strong revealed comparative advantage (RCA > 1 in all years), although the average RCA declines between early and late sub-periods. Gravity estimates show that destination market size (particularly population) positively predicts exports, while distance reduces expected export values. Importantly, in-force regional trade agreements are associated with significantly higher bilateral exports, approximately 48% larger export values, ceteris paribus, highlighting the relevance of policy-enabled market access alongside traditional gravity fundamentals. These findings emphasize the joint importance of competitiveness, trade-cost reduction, and effective utilization of trade agreements for sustaining and expanding Indonesia’s agribusiness exports.
Keywords: comparative advantage, gravity model, Indonesia, PPML, trade agreements
References
Bemelmans, J., Curzi, D., Olper, A., & Maertens, M. (2023). Trade effects of voluntary sustainability standards in tropical commodity sectors. Food Policy, 118, 102440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102440
Bozzola, M., Lamonaca, E., & Santeramo, F. G. (2023). Impacts of climate change on global agri-food trade. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110680
Chakradhar, J., Ganguly, A., Choudhury, R. N., & Jadhav, P. (2025). Trade policy uncertainty and agricultural exports: The mitigating roles of RTA and liberal democracies. Transnational Corporations Review, 17(4), 200160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200160
Dermoredjo, S. K., Darmawan, D. H. A., Sumedi, Mutaqin, Dani, F. Z. D. P., Yusuf, E. S., Pasaribu, S. M., Sayaka, B., Wardana, I. P., Adnyana, I. M. O., Estiningtyas, W., & Antriyandarti, E. (2025). The global sway of Indonesian palm oil: An export analysis. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 22, 102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102064
Heid, B., & Stähler, F. (2024). Structural gravity and the gains from trade under imperfect competition: Quantifying the effects of the European Single Market. Economic Modelling, 131, 106604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106604
Hendy, R., & Zaki, C. (2021). Trade facilitation and firms exports: Evidence from customs data. International Review of Economics & Finance, 75, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.03.023
Innayatuhibbah, G., & Ferichani, M. (2024). Export competitiveness of Indonesian coffee in the United States market. Scientific Horizons, 27, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor2.2024.125
Long, Y. (2021). Export competitiveness of agricultural products and agricultural sustainability in China. Regional Sustainability, 2(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2021.09.001
Lugo-Arias, E., Lugo-Arias, J., Vargas, S. B., de la Puente Pacheco, M. A., Granados, I. B., Heras, C. B., & Triana Hernández, D. (2024). Determinants of the competitiveness of world palm oil exports: A cointegration analysis. Transnational Corporations Review, 16(3), 200063. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tncr.2024.200063
Masood, A., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2024). Trade effects of trade facilitation revisited. Economics Letters, 234, 111477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111477
Mnasri, A., & Nechi, S. (2021). New nonlinear estimators of the gravity equation. Economic Modelling, 95, 192–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.12.011
Noureen, S., & Mahmood, Z. (2022). The effects of trade cost components and uncertainty of time delay on bilateral export growth. Heliyon, 8(1), e08779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08779
Pratiwi, I. (2021). The predictors of Indonesia’s palm oil export competitiveness: A gravity model approach. Journal of International Studies, 14, 250–262. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-3/16
Stender, F., & Vogel, T. (2025). What role for aid for trade in (deep) PTA relations? Empirical evidence from gravity model estimations. International Economics, 181, 100574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2024.100574
UNCTAD. (2019). RCA Radar | UNCTAD Data Hub. UN Trade & Development. https://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/RcaRadar.html
United Nations. (2025). UNSD — Classification Detail. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/Detail/EN/27/F
Wei, P., Liu, H., Xu, C., & Wen, S. (2024). Does Green Food Certification promote agri-food export quality? Evidence from China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 23(3), 1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2023.11.033
Xu, H., Nghia, D. T., & Nam, N. H. (2023). Determinants of Vietnam’s potential for agricultural export trade to Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) members. Heliyon, 9(2), e13105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13105
Xu, S., Qian, J., Chen, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025). Impact of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) implementation on the agricultural sector in regional countries: A global value chain perspective. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 24(1), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.11.035
Zhao, P., & Gao, S. (2025). Green trade barriers, financial support, and agricultural exports. International Review of Economics & Finance, 97, 103758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103758
Zhao, Y., Ji, C., Chen, Y., & Zhu, X. (2024). Who gains, who loses? – The impact of the belt and road initiative on bilateral agricultural trade. China Economic Review, 88, 102284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102284
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Johan R. Tumiwa, Octavia Diana Monica Tuegeh, Franda Benedicta Paat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







