STUDI KOMPARATIF PEMBOBOTAN KRITERIA AUDIT KINERJA AUDITOR BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN DENGAN PEMBOBOTAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCY PROCESS (STUDI KASUS PADA INSPEKTORAT KABUPATEN KEPULAUAN TALAUD)

Authors

  • Iwan Bin Lawitan
  • Herman Karamoy
  • Agus Tony Poputra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32400/ja.14435.5.2.2016.191-206

Abstract

This study aimed to recalculate the weighting of performance audit criteria by using Anlytical Hierarchy Process Method and comparing its results with the weighting of performance audit of Indonesian Supreme Audit Institution’s Auditor (BPK). Research conducted on Supervisory Apparatus Capability Model Government (APIP) at the Office of Inspectorate of Talaud Regency. This research is a descriptive qualitative-quantitative approach.Method of data collection with interviews, documentation and questionnaire. The results showed that in weighting of performance audit criteria, BPK’s auditor still use direct weighting and judgment, and there is a difference of percentage between performance audit criteria of BPK auditor and using AHP method.

Keywords : Weighting, Performance Audit Criteria, AHP

Downloads

Published

2016-12-31

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2016): Accountability

Section

Articles

License

The articles published in Jurnal Accountability are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International with authors as copyright holders.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Under this license then authors free to:
  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:
  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:
  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.