OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE, FREE CASH FLOW, ASSET STRUCTURE AND DIVIDEND POLICY ON DEBT POLICY

Authors

  • Nirina Tahir Khairun University
  • Asrudin Hormati Khairun University
  • Zainuddin Zainuddin Khairun University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32400/ja.27989.9.1.2020.28-35

Keywords:

ownership structure, free cash flow, asset structure, dividend policy, debt policy

Abstract

This study is designed based on problems related to debt policy. The debt policy in every company has a direct effect on the financial position. The use of debt that which too high provides great risk, but if the companies are able to manage debt properly; then the use of debt shall increase profits for shareholders. The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze the effects of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, free cash flow, assets structure, and dividend policy on companies indexed LQ-45 wich listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique of this study is purposive sampling which produced 85 observations. This study uses secondary data in the form of annual reports. The tool of analysis of this study is multiple regression with support of statistical package for social scientists (SPSS) software. The results show that: (1) managerial ownership has no effect on debt policy; (2) institutional ownership has a negative effect on debt policy; (3) free cash flow has a negative effect on debt policy; (4) assets structure has a negative effect on debt policy and (5) dividend policy has no effect on debt policy.

References

Akbar, D., & Ruzikna. (2016). pengaruh struktur kepemilikan, free cash flow, struktur aset, dan kebijakan dividen terhadap kebijakan hutang pada perusahaan sub sector otomotif dan komponen yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Jurnal Online mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 4(2), 1-11. https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFSIP/article/view/15670

Anggraini, R. D. (2011). Pengaruh kepemilikan institusional dan kepemilikan asing terhadap pengungkapan pertanggungjawaban sosial perusahaan dalam annual report (studi empiris padaperusahaan non keuangan yang tercatat di BEI Tahun 2008-2009). Skripsi Universitas Diponogoro.http://eprints.undip.ac.id/26641/

Atmaja, L. S. (2008). Teori dan praktek manajemen keuangan. Jogjakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Crutchley, C. E., & Hansen, R. S. (1989). A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends. Financial Management, 18(4), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665795

Djabid, A. W. (2009). Kebijakan dividen dan struktur kepemilikan terhadap kebijakan utang: Sebuah perspektif agency theory. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 13(2), 249–259.http://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/jkdp/article/view/933

Guinan, J. (2010). Investopedia: Cara Mudah Memahami Istilah Investasi. Jakarta: Hikmah.

Indahningrum, R. P., & Handayani, R. (2009). Pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dividen, perumbuhan perusahaan, free cash flow dan profitabilitas terhadap kebijakan hutang perusahaan. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 11(3), 189-207.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v11i3.244

Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, coporate finance and takeovers.American Economic Review, 76(2),323-339.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.99580

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4), 305-360. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Mardiyati, U., Qothrunnada, Q., & Kurnianti, D. (2018). Pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, struktur aktiva, ukuran perusahaan, pertumbuhan penjualan dan profitabilitas terhadap kebijakan utang pada perusahaan sektor aneka industri yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Periode 2012 – 2016. JRMSI - Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia, 9(1), 105–124.DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/jrmsi.009.1.08

Nafisa, A., Dzajuli, A., & Djumahir. (2016). Pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, ukuran perusahaan, pertumbuhan perusahaan, free cash flow dan profitabilitas terhadap kebijakan hutang perusahaan manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Ekonomi Bisnis, 21(2), 122–135.http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/ekobis/article/view/2022

Nasser, E. M. (2008). Pengaruh stuktur kepemilikan dan dewan komisaris independen terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan manajemen laba dan kebijakan hutang sebagai variabel intervening. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing Dan Informasi. 8(1), 1-27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v8i1.740

Putri, I. F., & Nasir, M. (2006). Analisis persamaan simultan kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, risiko, kebijakan hutang dan kebijakan dividen dalam perspektif teori keagenan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9 Padang, 23–26.http://blog.umy.ac.id/ervin/files/2012/06/K-AKPM-18.pdf

Rozeff, M. S. (1982). Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. TheJournal of Financial Research, 5(3), 249–259. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.1982.tb00299.x

Setiana, E., & Sibagariang, R. (2013). Pengaruh free cash flow dan kepemilikan manajerial terhadap kebijakan hutang pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Jurnal Telaah Akuntansi (15)1, 16-33. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/842/2/Full%20Text.pdf

Sinaga, G. Y. (2017). Pengaruh pertumbuhan perusahaan, free cash flow , struktur aset, likuiditas, profitabilitas, dan risiko bisnis terhadap kebijakan hutang. Skripsi. https://lib.unnes.ac.id/29892/

Sitanggang. (2013). Manajemen Keungan Perusahaan Lanjutan. Edisi 2. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.

Sugiarto. (2009). Struktur Modal, Struktur Kepemilikan Perusahaan, Permasalahan Keagenan dan Informasi Asimetri. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Surya, D., & Rahayuningsih, D. A. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kebijakan hutang perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar dalam Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 14(3), 213–225.https://jurnaltsm.id/index.php/JBA/article/view/143

Syamsuddin, L. (2009). Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Wahidahwati. (2002). Pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial dan kepemilikan institusional pada kebijakan hutang perusahaan : sebuah perspektif theory agency. The IndonesianJournal of Accounting Research (IJAR), 5(1). http://www.ijar-iaikapd.or.id/index.php/ijar/article/view/67

Warapsari, A., & Suaryana, I. (2016). Pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial dan institusional terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan kebijakan utang sebagai variabel intervening. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 16(3), 2288–2315.https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/20974

Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131-156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247880?seq=1

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2020-05-08

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

The articles published in Jurnal Accountability are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International with authors as copyright holders.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

Under this license then authors free to:
  • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:
  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:
  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.