Evaluasi Klinik Autorefraktor NIDEK TONOREF III Dibandingkan dengan Refraksi Subjektif pada Populasi Miopia Muda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35790/ecl.v11i2.46675Abstract
Abstract: Incidence of myopia has continued to increase in the last few decades and is expected to increase continually from time to time. Early detection of myopia is expected to prevent the occurrence of amblyopia, strabismus or other eye disorders. Autorefractor is a medical device that can be used before refraction examination in order to increase the efficiency in measurement of refractive disorders. However, the autorefractor used needs to be tested first to ensure the reliability of the tool in supporting clinical examinations. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the NIDEK TONOREF III autorefractor in daily clinical practice in young myopia population. The results obtained 42 subjects with myopic refractive error aged 20-41 years. The majority were females and had mild myopia. The statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the calculation of pupillary distance (p=0.581) and the correction results (p=0.842) between autorefractor and subjective refraction. In conclusion, the NIDEK Tonoref III autorefractor exhibits a high degree of reliability in evaluating glasses prescription and pupillary distance for cases of myopia.
Keywords: autorefractor; myopia; NIDEK TONOREF III; objective refraction; subjective refraction
Abstrak: Angka kejadian miopia terus mengalami peningkatan dalam beberapa dekade terakhir dan diperkirakan akan terus bertambah. Deteksi dini miopia diharapkan dapat mencegah terjadinya ambliopia, strabismus ataupun kelainan mata lainnya. Autorefraktor merupakan alat pemeriksaan yang dapat digunakan mendahului pemeriksaan refraksi untuk meningkatkan efisiensi pemeriksaan kelainan refraksi. Namun, autorefraktor yang digunakan perlu diuji terlebih dahulu sehingga menjamin keterandalan alat dalam menunjang pemeriksaan klinis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji keterandalan autorefraktor NIDEK TONOREF III dalam praktik klinis sehari-hari pada populasi miopia muda. Hasil penelitian mendapatkan 42 subjek penelitian dengan kelainan refraksi miopia pada rentang usia 20-41 tahun. Subjek terbanyak berada pada kategori miopia ringan dan berjenis kelamin perempuan. Hasil uji t-independen menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna pada perhitungan jarak antar pupil (p=0,581) serta hasil koreksi (p=0,842) antara autorefraktor dan refraksi subjektif. Simpulan penelitian ini ialah autorefraktor NIDEK Tonoref III memiliki keterandalan yang baik dalam menilai koreksi kacamata dan jarak antar pupil untuk kasus miopia.
Kata kunci: autorefraktor; miopia; NIDEK TONOREF III; refraksi objektif; refraksi subjektif
References
Cai X-B, Shen S-R, Chen D-F, Zhang Q, Jin Z-B. An overview of miopia genetics. Exp Eye Res. 2019;188:107778.
Morgan R, Speakman J, Grimshaw S. Inuit miopia: an environmentally induced" epidemic"? Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ). 1975;112(5):575.
Levi DM. Perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia: a reevaluation of critical periods in human vision. Developmental Psychobiology. 2005;46(3):222-32.
Steele AL, Bradfield YS, Kushner BJ, France TD, Struck MC, Gangnon RE. Successful treatment of anisometropic amblyopia with spectacles alone. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (JAAPOS). 2006;10(1):37-43.
Bullimore MA, Adams CW, Fusaro RE, Bauman M, Cotteral RM, Sarver JN, et al. Patient acceptance of auto-refractor and optometrist prescriptions: a randomized clinical trial. Optometry and Vision Science. 1995;72(12):97..
Davies LN, Mallen EAH, Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B. Clinical evaluation of the shin-nippon NVision-K 5001/grand seiko WR-5100K autorefractor. Optometry and Vision Science. 2003;80(4):320-4.
Sheppard AL, Davies LN. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko auto ref/keratometer WAM‐5500. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30(2):143-51.
Cleary G, Spalton D, Patel P, Lin PF, Marshall J. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin‐Nippon NVision‐K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29(2):173-81.
Wang D, Jin N, Pei R-X, Zhao L-Q, Du B, Liu G-H, et al. Comparison between two autorefractor performances in large scale vision screening in Chinese school age children. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(10):1660.
Stoor K, Karvonen E, Liinamaa J, Saarela V. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR‐360A in a randomized population‐based screening study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(4):384-9.
Rubio M, Hernández CS, Seco E, Perez-Merino P, Casares I, Dave SR, et al. Validation of an affordable handheld wavefront autorefractor. Optometry and Vision Science. 2019;96(10):726-32.
Iribarren R. Crystalline lens and refractive development. Prog Retin Eye Rese. 2015;47:86-106.
Twelker JD, Mitchell GL, Messer DH, Bhakta R, Jones LA, Mutti DO, et al. Children's ocular components and age, gender, and ethnicity. Optometry and Vision Science. 2009;86(8):918.
Matamoros E, Ingrand P, Pelen F, Bentaleb Y, Weber M, Korobelnik J-F, et al. Prevalence of miopia in France: a cross-sectional analysis. Medicine. 2015;94(45):e1976.
Mandel Y, Grotto I, El-Yaniv R, Belkin M, Israeli E, Polat U, et al. Season of birth, natural light, and miopia. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(4):686-92.
Xu L, Li J, Cui T, Hu A, Fan G, Zhang R, et al. Refractive error in urban and rural adult Chinese in Beijing. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(10):1676-83.
Cao K, Wan Y, Yusufu M, Wang N. Significance of outdoor time for miopia prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. Ophthalmic Res. 2020;63(2):97-105.
Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Tsubota K, Lanca C, Saw S-M. A review on the epidemiology of miopia in school children worldwide. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):1-11.
Deng L, Pang Y. Effect of outdoor activities in myopia control: meta-analysis of clinical studies. Optometry and Vision Science. 2019;96(4):276-82.
Wang J, He X-G, Xu X. The measurement of time spent outdoors in child miopia research: a systematic review. International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO). 2018;11(6):1045.
Nickels S, Hopf S, Pfeiffer N, Schuster AK. Myopia is associated with education: results from NHANES 1999-2008. PloS one. 2019;14(1):e0211196.
Aslan F, Sahinoglu-Keskek N. The effect of home education on miopia progression in children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eye. 2022;36(7):1427-32.
Czepita M, Czepita D, Safranow K. Role of gender in the prevalence of miopia among polish schoolchildren. J Ophthalmol. 2019;9748576. Doi: 10.1155/2019/9748576.
Krause U, Krause K, Rantakallio P. Sex differences in refraction errors up to the age of 15. Acta Ophthalmol. 1982;60(6):917-26.
Singman E, Matta N, Tian J, Silbert D. The accuracy of the plusoptiX for measuring pupillary distance. Strabismus. 2014;22(1):21-5.
Ekpenyong BN, Naidoo K, Ndep AO, Ahaiwe K, Ndukwe O, Nwandu D, et al. Comparative analysis of satisfaction with the use of ready-made spectacles and custom-made spectacles among school children in Nigeria: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing. 2017;35:15-21.
Prabhu A, Pinto AM, Thalukdar J, Ramesh SV. Inter-rater reliability for visual acuity, refractive error, corneal reflex, and inter-pupillary distance among two masked optometrists in school children population. Asian J Ophthalmol. 2019;16(3):160-7.
Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, et al. Global prevalence of miopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036-42.
Wilson S, Ctori I, Shah R, Suttle C, Conway ML. Systematic review and meta‐analysis on the agreement of non‐cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022;42(6):1276-88.
García-Montero M, Felipe-Márquez G, Arriola-Villalobos P, Garzón N. Pseudomyopia: a review. Vision. 2022;6(1):17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Vera Sumual, Ade J. Nursalim, Stevanus Paliliewu, Andrew Citra, Mochamad Sahroni, Dian Anggraini, Burhan Noho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors hold their copyright and grant this journal the privilege of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that permits others to impart the work with an acknowledgment of the work's origin and initial publication by this journal.
Authors can enter into separate or additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its underlying publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
