Right Ventricular Septal Pacing to Produce Narrow QRS Duration in Patient with High Degree 2:1 AV Block

Authors

  • Michael Santoso Universitas Sam Ratulangi
  • Benny Setiadi Universitas Sam Ratulangi
  • Starry H. Rampengan Universitas Sam Ratulangi
  • Edmond L. Jim Universitas Sam Ratulangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35790/ecl.v13i2.56247

Abstract

Prolonged right ventricular (RV) apical pacing has been recognized to be associated with progressive left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. This impairment of LV function resultant from RV apical pacing is a remodelling process consequent to abnormal ventricular activation and contraction. RV septal pacing theoretically is associated with a more physiological ventricular activation results in shorter electrical activation delay and consequently less mechanical dyssynchrony. We reported A-75-year-old woman presented to emergency department (ED) with dyspnea only on exertion in the last 3 weeks before admission, she also complaint near syncope episode while doing activities. Electrocardiogram (ECG) result was high degree AV block with 2:1 conduction with ventricular rate 40 beats per minute. PPM implantation was performed with VVIR mode, ventricle lead inserted into mid-septal RV. ECG post implantation showed pacing rhythm with narrow QRS duration. Pacemaker-related LBBB is associated with an adverse prognosis. RV septal pacing produces more synchronous contraction denoted by narrow QRS, preventing the deterioration of LV structure and function. RV septal pacing, although not as good as intrinsic conduction or His bundle pacing, may be more desirable for chronic RV pacing compared to the RV apex as a narrow QRS is associated with improved LV dynamics. RV septal pacing was safely done in this patient, but further study needed to evaluate its long-term effect.

Keywords: AV block; permanent pacemaker; septal; right ventricle

Author Biographies

Michael Santoso, Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Specialist Program of Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado, Indonesia

Benny Setiadi, Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado, Indonesia

Starry H. Rampengan, Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado, Indonesia

Edmond L. Jim, Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado, Indonesia

References

Lamas GA, Lee K, Sweeney M, Leon A, Yee R, Ellenbogen K, et al. The Mode Selection Trial (MOST) in sinus node dysfunction: Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the first 1000 patients. Am Heart J. 2000;140(4):541-51. Doi:10.1067/mhj.2000.109652

Sharma AD, Rizo-Patron C, Hallstrom AP, O'Neill GP, Rothbart S, Martins JB, et al. Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID trial. Hear Rhythm. 2005;2(8):830-34. Doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm. 2005.05.015

Mizukami A, Matsue Y, Naruse Y, Kowase S, Kurosaki K, Suzuki M, et al. Implications of right ventricular septal pacing for medium-term prognosis: Propensity-matched analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;220:214-18. Doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.250

Das A, Kahali D. Ventricular septal pacing: Optimum method to position the lead. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(5):713-20. Doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.01.023

Mond HG. The road to right ventricular septal pacing: Techniques and tools. PACE – Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010; 33(7):888-98. Doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02777.x

Burri H, Park C Il, Zimmermann M, Gentil-Baron P, Stettler C, Sunthorn H, et al. Utility of the surface electrocardiogram for confirming right ventricular septal pacing: Validation using electroanatomical mapping. Europace. 2011;13(1):82-6. Doi:10.1093/europace/euq332

Stambler BS, Ellenbogen KA, Zhang X, Porter TR, Xie F, Malik R, et al. Right ventricular outflow versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14(11):1180-6. Doi:10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.03216.x

Zou C, Song J, Li H, Huang X, Liu Y, Zhao C et al. Right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(4):1-7. Doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001777.

Kaye GC, Linker NJ, Marwick TH, Pollock L, Graham L, Pouliot E, et al. Effect of right ventricular pacing lead site on left ventricular function in patients with high-grade atrioventricular block: results of the Protect-Pace study. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(14):856-62. Doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu304

Worsnick S, Sharma P, Vijayaraman P. Right ventricular septal pacing: a paradigm shift. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018;9(5):3137-46. Doi: 10.19102/icrm.2018.090501.

Spath NB, Wang K, Venkatasumbramanian S, Fersia O, Newby DE, Lang CC et al. Complications and prognosis of patients undergoing apical or septal right ventricular pacing. Open Hear. 2019;6(1):e000962. Doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000962

Downloads

Published

2025-03-21

How to Cite

Santoso, M., Setiadi, B., Rampengan, S. H., & Jim, E. L. (2025). Right Ventricular Septal Pacing to Produce Narrow QRS Duration in Patient with High Degree 2:1 AV Block. E-CliniC, 13(2), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.35790/ecl.v13i2.56247

Issue

Section

Articles