Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Fungsi Anus setelah Prosedur PSARP pada Pasien Malformasi Anorektal

Authors

  • Vincent Suryoprabowo Universitas Sam Ratulangi
  • Harsali F. Lampus Universitas Sam Ratulangi
  • Leo Rendy Universitas Sam Ratulangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35790/ecl.v14i1.65307

Keywords:

malformasi anorektal; PSARP; fungsi anus; skor Rintala

Abstract

Abstract: In anorectal malformations (ARM), posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) procedure is the standard management, however, the anorectal functional outcomes vary. This study aimed to assess the factors affecting anorectal function after the PSARP procedure using the Rintala score. This was a retrospective cohort study of 29 ARM patients who underwent PSARP at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital Manado during the 2019–2022 period. Medical records and patient follow-up data were analyzed using the chi-square test and linear regression. The results showed that of the 29 patients (13 males, 16 females), 86.2% underwent staged repair, while the rest had one-stage repair. The mean Rintala score was 14.59±4.17; 24.1% had normal function, 62.1% good, 6.9% fair, and 6.9% poor. Adequate bowel management was performed in all patients. Surgical wound infection was found in one patient (3.4%). Re-do PSARP was performed in four patients (13.8%). There were no cases of malnutrition or musculoskeletal abnormalities. Syndromic diseases were found in three patients (10.3%). Multivariate analysis showed that no variables were significantly associated with the Rintala score (p>0.05). In conclusion, the majority of patients have good–normal anal function after PSARP. There is no significant relationship between bowel management, surgical wound infection, redo PSARP, malnutrition, musculoskeletal abnormalities, or syndromic diseases and anal function. Continuous bowel management education remains important for long-term outcomes.

Keywords: anorectal malformation; PSARP; anal function; Rintala score

 

 Abstrak: Pada malformasi anorektal (MAR), prosedur posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) merupakan standar tatalaksana, namun luaran fungsi anus bervariasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi fungsi anus setelah prosedur PSARP menggunakan skor Rintala. Jenis penelitian ialah kohort retrospektif terhadap 29 pasien MAR yang menjalani PSARP di RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Manado periode 2019–2022. Data rekam medis dan follow-up pasien dianalisis menggunakan uji chi-square dan regresi linear. Hasil penelitian mendapatkan dari 29 pasien (13 laki-laki, 16 perempuan), 86,2% menjalani staged repair, sisanya one stage repair. Skor Rintala rerata 14,59±4,17; 24,1% fungsi normal, 62,1% baik, 6,9% cukup, dan 6,9% buruk. Businasi adekuat dilakukan pada seluruh pasien. Infeksi luka operasi ditemukan pada satu pasien (3,4%). Re-do PSARP dilakukan pada empat pasien (13,8%). Tidak terdapat kasus malnutrisi maupun kelainan muskuloskeletal. Penyakit sindromik penyerta ditemukan pada tiga pasien (10,3%). Analisis multivariat menunjukkan tidak terdapat variabel yang berhubungan bermakna dengan skor Rintala (p>0,05). Simpulan penelitian ini ialah mayoritas pasien memiliki fungsi anus baik–normal pasca-PSARP. Tidak terdapat hubungan bermakna faktor businasi, infeksi luka operasi, re-do PSARP, malnutrisi, kelainan muskuloskeletal, maupun penyakit sindromik terhadap fungsi anus. Edukasi businasi berkelanjutan tetap penting untuk luaran jangka panjang.

Kata kunci: malformasi anorektal; PSARP; fungsi anus; skor Rintala

Author Biographies

Vincent Suryoprabowo, Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Bagian Ilmu Bedah Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado, Indonesia

Harsali F. Lampus, Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Divisi Ilmu Bedah Anak, Bagian Ilmu Bedah, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi - RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou, Manado, Indonesia

Leo Rendy, Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Divisi Ilmu Bedah Anak, Bagian Ilmu Bedah, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Sam Ratulangi , Manado, Indonesia

References

1. Piperidis AA, Scribante J, Bebington C, Brisighelli G. Comparing the profile of patients with anorectal malformations and delayed presentation of anorectal malformations in the Johannesburg paediatric colorectal clinic: a retrospective study. Pediatr Surg Int. 2025;41(1):3. Doi:10.1007/s00383-025-06072-0

2. Hassan L, Rosenberg CBM, Cortenraad SAM, Kimman ML, Haanen M, van Gemert WG, et al. Anorectal malformation and outcome review (ARMOUR) project: A systematic review for the outcomes reported in patients with an anorectal malformation. BMJ Paediatr Open.BMJ Publishing Group. 2025;9(1):4. Doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003192

3. Munandar AA, Ahmadwirawan, Mariana N, Kusuma MI, Sulmiati, Laidding SR, et al. Functional continence in anorectal malformation after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Acta Biomedica. 2024;95(6):4. Doi: 10.23750/abm.v95i6.15713

4. Zhang TT, Huang YB, He YY, Chen F, Ying JB, Sun SQ, et al. Analysis of risk factors for anorectal malformations combined with Tethered Cord Syndrome and the impact of untethering surgery on anorectal function in related children: preliminary results from a single-center study. Children. 2024;11(12):1504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121504

5. Hageman IC, Trajanovska M, King SK, van der Steeg HJ, Morandi A, Amerstorfer EE, et al. Anorectal malformation patients in Australia and Europe: different location, same problem? A retrospective comparative registry-based study. J Pediatr Surg. 2024;59(12):5. Doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161879

6. Peña A, Devries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: Important technical considerations and new applications. Pediatr Surg. 1982;17(6):796-811. Doi:10.1016/S0022-3468(82)80448-X.

7. Levitt MA, Peña A. Anorektal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2(1):33. Doi:10.1186/1750-1172-2-33.

8. Rahmi M, Gunadi, Dwihantoro A. Prognostic faktors for functional outcomes in anorectal malformation (Krickenberg classification) patients following definitive surgery in Dr. Sardjito Hospital Yogyakarta using Rintala scoring. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2017.

9. Massenga A, Chibwae A, Nuri AA, Bugimbi M, Munisi YK, Mfinanga R, et al. Indications for and complications of intestinal stomas in the children and adults at a tertiary care hospital in a resource-limited setting: a Tanzanian experience. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):157. Doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1070-5

10. Samiatin, Sudiana IK, Harmayetty. Hubungan pengetahuan orang tua terhadap perawatan businasi post PSARP di poli bedah RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya [Tesis]. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga; 2016. Available from: http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/29572

11. Ahmad H, Chogle A, Flyer Z, Shaul D, Gyu MY, Seom GK, et al. Long-term outcomes and multidisciplinary management in children with anorectal malformations. Kosin Medical Journal. 2025;40(3):167-76. Doi:10.7180/kmj.25.120

12. Wondemagegnehu BD, Asfaw SW, Mamo TN. Incidence of associated anomalies in children with anorectal malformation A 1-year prospective observational study in a low-income setting. Medicine (United States). 2024;103(38):39811. Doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000039811

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Suryoprabowo, V., Lampus, H. F., & Rendy, L. (2025). Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Fungsi Anus setelah Prosedur PSARP pada Pasien Malformasi Anorektal . E-CliniC, 14(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.35790/ecl.v14i1.65307

Issue

Section

Articles