About the Journal

JTEK · Journal Information
Journal Information & Editorial Policies
Information regarding the journal's scope, peer-review process, publication policies, publication ethics, accreditation, and publisher.
Journal at a Glance
Accreditation
SINTA 5
Valid until 2027
Review Model
Double Anonymous
Peer Review
Access
Open Access
Immediate Access
Publication
3 Issues / Year
April · August · December
01 Focus and Scope

Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer (JTEK) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes original research articles and review papers in the fields of electrical engineering, computer engineering, computer science, and related technologies. The journal focuses on the development, analysis, design, and implementation of engineering systems, methods, and algorithms with clear theoretical foundations and practical applications.

The scope of JTEK includes, but is not limited to, the following areas:

Electrical Engineering
  • Power systems and energy conversion
  • Control systems and automation
  • Signal processing and communication systems
  • Electronics and instrumentation
  • Robotics and mechatronics
Computer Engineering and Computer Science
  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning
  • Embedded systems and Internet of Things (IoT)
  • Computer networks and information security
  • Software engineering and information systems
  • Multimedia systems and data processing
JTEK aims to serve researchers, academics, and practitioners by providing a scientific platform for disseminating high-quality and impactful research that contributes to the advancement of electrical and computer engineering at national and international levels.
02 Peer Review Process

Peer review is an essential component of scholarly publishing and is conducted to maintain the scientific quality, originality, validity, and relevance of manuscripts published in Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer (JTEK).

1
Initial Manuscript Evaluation
All submitted manuscripts are initially evaluated by the Editors. Manuscripts may be rejected at this stage if they are outside the aims and scope of the journal, lack sufficient originality, contain serious scientific flaws, or fail to meet minimum standards of academic presentation. Manuscripts that meet the initial criteria are normally forwarded to at least two reviewers.
2
Type of Peer Review
Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer employs a double anonymous peer-review process , in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed throughout the review process. Authors are therefore required to anonymize their manuscripts before the review process begins.
3
Reviewer Selection
Reviewers are selected according to their expertise and relevance to the subject area of the submitted manuscript. Whenever possible, the Editorial Team appoints reviewers with suitable academic and research backgrounds relevant to the manuscript.
4
Review Reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is original, methodologically sound, ethically appropriate, clearly presented, supported by valid results and conclusions, and adequately refers to relevant previous research.
5
Review and Revision
The duration of the review process may depend on reviewer availability and the complexity of the manuscript. When reviewer recommendations differ significantly, the Editors may seek an additional expert opinion. Revised manuscripts may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation.
6
Final Decision
A final editorial decision to accept, revise, or reject the manuscript will be communicated to the corresponding author together with reviewer recommendations.
7
Editorial Authority
Reviewers provide recommendations to the Editors. The Editor is responsible for making the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of the manuscript.
Interested in becoming a reviewer? Researchers and academics with appropriate expertise who wish to contribute as reviewers for Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer may contact the Editorial Team.
03 Publication Frequency

Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer (JTEK) is published three times a year in:

April August December
04 Open Access Policy

Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer provides immediate open access to its published content based on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports wider dissemination and a greater global exchange of knowledge.

05 Publication Ethics

Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer (JTEK) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Electrical Engineering Study Program, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado. The journal is committed to maintaining high standards of publication ethics and preventing all forms of academic misconduct and plagiarism.

This publication ethics statement describes the ethical responsibilities of all parties involved in the publication process, including authors, editors, reviewers, the Editorial Board, and the publisher.

The journal's publication ethics principles are based on internationally recognized standards of scholarly publishing, including Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) .

Ethical Principles
Neutrality Editorial decisions should be free from inappropriate conflicts of interest and external influence. Justice Authorship and academic recognition should be given fairly to individuals who have made genuine scholarly contributions. Honesty Scientific publications must be free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and other forms of research misconduct.
Duties of Editors

Publication Decisions. Editors are responsible for determining which submitted manuscripts should be published. Decisions should be based on the validity, originality, significance, relevance, and quality of the scholarly work.

Fair Play. Editors evaluate manuscripts based on their intellectual and scientific content without discrimination based on personal, institutional, cultural, religious, political, or other irrelevant characteristics of the authors.

Confidentiality. Editors and editorial staff must maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and must not disclose information about a manuscript except to appropriate persons involved in the editorial and peer-review process.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest. Editors must not use unpublished information contained in submitted manuscripts for their own research or personal benefit without explicit permission from the authors.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions. Peer review assists Editors in making editorial decisions and can also help authors improve the scientific quality of their manuscripts.

Promptness. A reviewer who is unable to conduct a qualified or timely review should notify the Editors and decline the review assignment.

Confidentiality. Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and should not be shared or discussed with unauthorized parties.

Standards of Objectivity. Reviews should be conducted objectively and professionally. Reviewers should provide clear, constructive, and evidence-based comments.

Acknowledgment of Sources. Reviewers should identify relevant published research that has not been appropriately cited and alert Editors to substantial similarities with other published works.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. Reviewers should not evaluate manuscripts where significant conflicts of interest could compromise the independence or objectivity of the review.

Duties of Authors

Reporting Standards. Authors should provide an accurate account of the research conducted and an objective discussion of its scientific significance.

Data Access and Retention. Authors should retain research data and, when appropriate, be prepared to provide supporting data for editorial or scientific verification.

Originality and Plagiarism. Authors must ensure that submitted work is original and that all sources and previously published materials are appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication. Authors should not submit substantially the same manuscript simultaneously to more than one journal.

Acknowledgment of Sources. Authors should properly acknowledge and cite publications that have significantly influenced the reported research.

Authorship. Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made significant scholarly contributions to the conception, design, execution, analysis, or interpretation of the research.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest. Authors should disclose financial, professional, or other relevant conflicts of interest that may influence the interpretation of the research.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works. When authors discover significant errors in their published work, they should promptly notify the Editors and cooperate in correcting or retracting the publication when necessary.

06 Journal Accreditation
Accredited
SINTA 5
Nationally Accredited Scientific Journal

Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer (JTEK) is nationally accredited at SINTA 5 and the accreditation is valid until 2027.

This accreditation reflects JTEK's commitment to maintaining standards in scientific publishing, editorial management, peer review, publication ethics, and dissemination of research in the fields of electrical engineering, computer engineering, computer science, and related technologies.

View JTEK on SINTA
07 Publisher

Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer (JTEK) is published by:

Jurusan Teknik Elektro
Fakultas Teknik
Universitas Sam Ratulangi
Visit JTEK Website
Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Komputer (JTEK) · Journal Information & Editorial Policies
Fakultas Teknik · Universitas Sam Ratulangi