Penilaian Parut Hipertrofi Luka Bakar Berdasarkan Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scales (POSAS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35790/msj.v6i1.46566Abstract
Abstract: Hypertrophic scar of burn can occur due to the imbalances in the wound healing process that can affect the quality of life. Patient and Observer Scar assessment Scales (POSAS) is an assessment instrument both from the patient and the observer. This study aimed to assess hypertrophic scars with POSAS. This was an observational and analytical study with a cross sectional design. Samples were patient with burns admitted to Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital, Manado, and its network hospitals. The assessment was carried out directly when the patients being admitted to the hospital. Each patient who met the requirements had demographic and clinical data taken. Subsequent assessments were carried out at one month and six months after the initial treatment procedure. The results obtained 30 patients with burn dominated by females (63%). The most common degree of burns was superficial-middermal (67%). The assessment of POSAS by doctors and patients tended to be the same and both decreased in the first month and the sixth month after initial treatment procedure with a mean value of the total pre- initial treatment procedure score of 51.3±12.1; 1st month 44.2±9.5; 6th month 30.3±5.9. In conclusion, the evaluation of burns that produce acceptable hypertrophic scars using the POSAS score shows similarities in the assessment of observers and patients. Moreover, precautions at the beginning of the observation will affect the POSAS score
Keywords: burn; hypertrophic scar; Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scales
Abstrak: Parut hipertrofi paska luka bakar dapat terjadi karena ketidakseimbangan pada proses penyembuhan luka yang dapat memengaruhi kualitas hidup. Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scales (POSAS) merupakan instrumen penilaian parut baik dari pasien maupun observer. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai parut hipertrofi dengan menggunakan POSAS. Jenis penelitian ialah observasional analitik dengan desain potong lintang. Sampel penelitian ialah pasien dengan luka bakar yang dirawat di RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou dan rumah sakit jejaring. Penilaian dilakukan langsung saat pasien masuk rumah sakit. Setiap pasien yang memenuhi persyaratan diambil data demografik dan kliniknya. Penilaian selanjutnya dilakukan pada satu bulan dan enam bulan paska tindakan perawatan awal. Hasil penelitian mendapatkan 30 pasien dengan luka bakar yang didominasi oleh pasien perempuan (63%). Derajat luka bakar terbanyak ialah superficial-middermal (67%). Penilaian POSAS oleh dokter dan pasien cenderung sama dan mengalami penurunan baik pada bulan pertama dan bulan keenam setelah tindakan dengan nilai mean skor total pra tindakan 51,3±12,1; bulan pertama 44,2±9,5; dan bulan keenam 30,3±5,9. Simpulan penelitian ini ialah evaluasi luka bakar yang menghasilkan jaringan parut akseptabel menggunakan skor POSAS menunjukkan kesamaan penilaian menurut observer dan pasien. Tindakan pencegahan pada awal pengamatan akan memengaruhi skor POSAS.
Kata kunci: luka bakar; parut hipertrofi; Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scales
References
Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JB, et al. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery (10th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2015. p. 228-9, 242-45.
Kaddoura I, Abu-Sittah G, Ibrahim A, Karamanoukian R, Papazian N. Burn injury: review of pathophysio-logy and therapeutic modalities in major burns. Ann Burn Fire Disasters. 2017;30(2):95-102.
Pokok-pokok hasil Riskesdas Indonesia 2013. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan, Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia: Jakarta. 2013. Available from: https://komnaspt.or.id/ wp-content/ uploads/ 2020/12/Riset_Riskesdas-2013_Balitbang-Kemenkes_2013.pdf
Ramli RN, Prawoto A, Riasa NP, Saputro ID, Mas’ud AF. Epidemiology and knowledge of first aid treatment related to burn injury in the rural region of Kulon Progo. J Med Sci. 2021;9(E):101-8.
Claresta KE, Hatibie M. Retrospective evaluation of burn injured patient in Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital. Bali Med J. 2019; 8(2):48-65
Thorne CH, Chung KC, Gozain AK, Gurtner GC, Mehrara BJ, Rubin JP, et al. Grabb and Smiths Plastic Surgery (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 14-8.
Brodie L, Brodribb RK, Dickson D, Farey N, Mandeno D, Leicth I, et al. Emergency management of severe burns (17th ed). Queensland: Australia and New Zealand Burn Association (ANZBA); 2013. p. 24-6, 39-42.
Finlay V, Burrows S, Burmaz M, Yawary H, Lee J, Edgar DW, et al. Increased burn healing time is associated with higher Vancouver Scar Scale score. Scars, Burns Heal. 2017;3(1):1-10. Doi: 10.1177/2059513117695324.
Berchialla P, Gangemi EN, Foltran F, Haxhiaj A, Buja A, Lazzarato F, et al. Predicting severity of pathological scarring due to burn injuries: a clinical decision making tool using Bayesian networks. Int Wound J. 2014;11(3):246-52. Doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01080.x.
Mundy LR, Miller HC, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Pusic AL. Patient-reported outcome instruments for surgical and traumatic scars: a systematic review of their development, content, and psychometric validation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016;40(5):792-800. Doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0642-9.
Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2010;10:354-63.
Mortada H, Malatani N, Aljaaly H. Knowledge & awereness of burn first aid among health care worker in Saudi Arabia: Are health care workers in need for an effective educational program? J Family Med Prim Care. 2020:9(8):4259-64. Doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_811_20.
Van Der Wal MBA, Tuinebreijer WE, Bloemen MCT, Verhaegen PDHM, Middlekoop E, Van Zuijlen PPM. Rasch analysis of the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) in burn scars. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(1):13-23. Doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9924-5.
Kabuk A, Kazan E E, Aydogan C. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of patient and observer scar assesment scale in patient with burns. Turk J Dermatol. 2017;11(4):179-83.
Wardhana A, Basuki A, Prameswara ADH, Rizkita DN, Andarie AA, Canintika AF. The epidemiology of burn in Indonesia’s national referral burn center from 2013 to 2015. Burn Open. 2017;1(2):67-73.
Febrianto R, Farhanah N, Sari E P. Hubungan luka bakar derajat sedang dan berat menurut kategori American Burn Association dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kejadian sepsis di RSUP DR. Kariadi. Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro. 2016;5(4):1526-34.
Koyro KI, Bingoel AS, Bucher F, Vogt PM. Burn guidline-an international comparison. Eur Burn J. 2021; 2:125-39. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj2030010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eko S. Sinaga, Mendy Hatibie, Maximillian C. Oley, Fredrik G. Langi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors hold their copyright and grant this journal the privilege of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that permits others to impart the work with an acknowledgment of the work's origin and initial publication by this journal.
Authors can enter into separate or additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its underlying publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
