EVALUASI KERASIONALAN PENGGUNAAN ANTIBIOTIK PADA PENGOBATAN BRONKITIS KRONIK PASIEN RAWAT JALAN DI RSUP PROF. DR. R. D. KANDOU MANADO PERIODE JUNI 2013-JUNI 2014

Authors

  • Jefta Abraham Sanni

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35799/pha.4.2015.8832

Abstract

EVALUASI KERASIONALAN PENGGUNAAN ANTIBIOTIK PADA PENGOBATAN BRONKITIS KRONIK PASIEN RAWAT JALAN DI RSUP PROF. DR. R. D. KANDOU MANADO PERIODE JUNI 2013-JUNI 2014

 

Abraham Sanni1), Fatimawali1), Hamidah Sri Supriati2)

1) Program Studi Farmasi Fakultas MIPA UNSRAT Manado, 95115

2) Program Studi DIII Farmasi STIKES Muhammadiyah Manado, 95115

 

ABSTRACT

Rational use of antibiotics have to comply several criteria like the appropriate patients, appropriate indication, appropriate drug, appropriate dose, and appropriate duration. This study was aimed to evaluate the rational utilizing of antibiotics in the treatment of chronic bronchitis in outpatients installation of RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Manado. This research is a descriptive study with retrospective data aggregation based on medical records. Research conducted on 18 medical record of chronic bronchitis patient with 22 antibiotics usage. The result showed, that evaluation of rational use of antibiotics to the appropriate patient as much as 22 antibiotics (100%), appropriate indication as much as 22 antibiotics (100%), appropriate drug as much as 10 antibiotics (45,46%), appropriate dose as much as 22 antibiotics (100%), and appropriate duration as much as 20 antibiotics (90,9%). The  most used antibiotic in the treatment of chronic bronchitis is cefadroxil (44,45%).

 

Keywords : Rational, Antibiotics, Chronic Bronchitis, Outpatients

 

ABSTRAK

Penggunaan antibiotik yang rasional harus memenuhi beberapa kriteria, yaitu tepat pasien, tepat indikasi, tepat obat, tepat dosis dan tepat lama pemberian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kerasionalan penggunaan antibiotik pada pengobatan bronkitis kronik di Instalasi Rawat Jalan di RSUP Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Manado. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pengambilan data secara retrospektif yang didasarkan pada data rekam medik. Penelitian dilakukan terhadap 18 data rekam medik penderita bronkitis kronik dengan 22 pemberian antibiotik. Hasil penelitian menunjukan evaluasi penggunaan antibiotik yang rasional berdasarkan kriteria tepat pasien sebanyak 22 pemberian antibiotik (100%), tepat indikasi sebanyak 22 pemberian antibiotik (100%), tepat obat sebanyak 10 pemberian antibiotik (45,46 %), tepat dosis sebanyak 22 pemberian antibiotik (100%), dan tepat lama pemberian sebanyak 20 pemberian antibiotik (90,9%). Jenis antibiotik yang paling banyak digunakan untuk pengobatan bronkitis kronik adalah sefadroksil (44,45%).

 

Kata kunci: kerasionalan, antibiotik, bronkitis kronik, rawat jalan

Downloads

Published

2015-08-06

How to Cite

Sanni, J. A. (2015). EVALUASI KERASIONALAN PENGGUNAAN ANTIBIOTIK PADA PENGOBATAN BRONKITIS KRONIK PASIEN RAWAT JALAN DI RSUP PROF. DR. R. D. KANDOU MANADO PERIODE JUNI 2013-JUNI 2014. PHARMACON, 4(3), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.35799/pha.4.2015.8832

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2015): Pharmacon

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)