Perbedaan Tingkat Akurasi Perhitungan Space Mantainer dengan Metode Radiografi dan Model Gigi pada Pasien Anak Usia 7-10 Tahun
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35790/eg.v14i1.62218Keywords:
space maintainer; model gigi; radiografi panoramik; metode Moyers; metode HuckabaAbstract
Abstract: Space caused by the early loss of primary teeth needs to be analyzed through clinical and radiographic examinations until the eruption phase of permanent teeth. Proper analysis can ensure that permanent teeth have enough space to grow properly, reducing the risk of malocclusion and other dental problems. Space maintainer devices can be used to maintain the available space, thus supporting healthy and regular tooth growth. This study aimed to determine the difference in the level of accuracy of space maintainer calculations using radiographic methods and tooth models in children at RSGM IIK Bhakti Wiyata. This was an analytical survey study with a saturated sampling design. Samples consisted of 10 pediatric patients aged 7-10 years. Data were obtained using a comparison of the results of tooth model calculations and panoramic radiography. The discrepancy calculation on the tooth model and panoramic radiography obtained different results, with an average difference of 1 to 1.2 cm. The average of the sums for the two data groups was -5.4 mm for the tooth model, and 5.3 cm for the panoramic radiography. The independent t-test showed a p-value of 0.140 (p>0.05). In conclusion, there is no significant difference in the results of space maintainer calculations using tooth models and panoramic radiographs in pediatric patients aged 7-10 years at RSGM IIK Bhakti Wiyata.
Keywords: space maintainer; dental model; panoramic radiograph; Moyers method; Huckaba method
Abstrak: Ruang akibat tanggalnya gigi sulung secara dini perlu dianalisis melalui pemeriksaan klinis dan radiografi sampai fase erupsi gigi permanen. Analisis yang tepat dapat memastikan gigi permanen memiliki cukup ruang untuk tumbuh dengan benar, mengurangi risiko maloklusi dan masalah gigi lainnya. Space maintainer dapat digunakan untuk mempertahankan ruang yang tersedia, sehingga mendukung pertumbuhan gigi yang sehat dan teratur. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan tingkat akurasi hasil perhitungan space maintainer dengan metode radiografi dan model gigi pada anak di RSGM IIK Bhakti Wiyata. Metode penelitian ialah survei analitik dengan rancangan penelitian sampling jenuh. Sampel berjumlah 10 pasien anak usia 7-10 tahun. Data diperoleh menggunakan perbandingan hasil perhitungan model gigi dan radiografi panoramik. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan perhitungan diskrepansi pada model gigi dan radiografi panoramik memiliki perbedaan hasil dengan rerata selisih hasil kedua kelompok data ialah 1 hingga 1,2 mm. Rerata hasil penjumlahan kedua kelompok data ialah -5,4 mm pada cetakan model gigi dan 5,3 mm pada radiografi panoramik. Hasil uji t-test menunjukkan nilai signifikansi sebesar 0,140 (p>0,05). Simpulan penelitian ini ialah tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna pada hasil perhitungan space maintainer dengan model gigi dan foto radiografi panoramik pada pasien anak usia 7-10 tahun di RSGM IIK Bhakti Wiyata.
Kata kunci: space maintainer; model gigi; radiografi panoramik; metode Moyers; metode Huckaba
References
1. Sudir-Man A. Faktor–faktor yang mempengaruhi kejadian karies gigi pada siswa kelas 1 di SD Negeri 1 Pekkae Kecamatan Tanete Rilau Kabupaten Barru. 2014. Available from: https://www.academia. edu/32994121/FAKTOR_FAKTOR_YANG_MEMPENGARUHI_KEJADIAN_KARIES_GIGI_PADA_SISWA_KELAS_1_DI_SD_NEGERI_1_PEKKAE_KECAMATAN_TANETE_RILAU_KABUPATEN_BARRU
2. Farani W, Dewi A. Prevalensi premature loss gigi desidui pada anak usia 9-10 tahun. Insisiva Dental Journal. 2018;7(2):43-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18196/DI.7295.
3. Erwansyah E, Damayanti R, Horax S, Gadisha SB. Preventive orthodontics treatment with space maintainer in the early loss of deciduous tooth. Makassar Dental Journal 2021;5(1):55–60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35856/MDJ.V10I1.388.
4. Pamungkas RB, Jeffrey. Space maintainer treatment in premature loss deciduous tooth. Sonde. 2020;5(1):1–12. Doi: 10.28932/SOD.V5I1.2325.
5. Sholapurmath SM, Benni DB, Mandroli P. Applicability of two mixed dentition analysis in children of Jangam Community of Belgaum City. World Journal of Dentistry 2012;3(4):324–9. Doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1183.
6. Pawar RO, Bhat SR. Prediction of mesiodistal width of the mandibular permanent canines and premolars by utilizing the mesiodistal width of mandibular first permanent molars and incisors. International Journal of Scientific Study. 2016:3(12):178-82. Doi: 10.17354/ijss/2016/144.
7. Pasler FA, Visser Heiko. Pocket Atlas of Dental Radiology. New York: Thieme; 2011.
8. Langland OS, Langlai RP, Preece JW. Principal of Dental Imaging (2nd ed). Philadhelpia; Lippincot Williaams and Wilkins: 2002. p. 333.
9. Alvarado-Lorenzo A, Antonio-Zancajo L, Curto A, Garcovich D, Criado-Pérez L. Reproducibility and reliability of dental arch measurements: comparing of manual, digital, and app-based methods. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1–11. Doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05392-2
10. Okamoto A, Karibe H, Tanaka S, Kawakami T, Shinya A. Reliability of mixed dentition space analysis using a digital model obtained from an optical impression: a preliminary study. BMC Res Notes. 2024;17(1):12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/S13104-023-06678-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Richa R. A. Tias, Annisa Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors hold their copyright and grant this journal the privilege of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that permits others to impart the work with an acknowledgment of the work's origin and initial publication by this journal.
Authors can enter into separate or additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its underlying publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example, in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
