Cardinal Fish Otolith Biometrics Banggai Pterapogon kauderni Koumans, 1933 In the Front Waters of Dudepo TPI Dudepo, South Bolaang Mongondow Regency and in the Lembeh Strait, Bitung City

Authors

  • Hellen Melani Sam Ratulangi University
  • Ari B. Rondonuwu
  • Joudy R.R Sangari
  • Fransine B. Manginsela
  • Silvester B. Pratasik
  • Suzanne L. Undap

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35800/jip.v11i1.44002

Keywords:

Otolith;, characteristics;, sex;, location;

Abstract

This study aims to determine the biometric comparison of otoliths of Banggai cardinal fish based on gender and to determine the comparison of otolith biometrics at two locations in the Waters Front of TPI Dudepo Kab. South Bolaang Mongondow and in the Lembeh Strait, Bitung City. Data collection in the field using the roaming survey method. Fishing is done by snorkelling, catching a minimum of 50 individuals representing each size class using Chang net/Sibu fishing gear. The differences in otoliths in male and female sexes have seven different otolith characters in otolith length (OL), otolith width (OW), otolith area (OA) and otolith perimeter (OP), roundness (Rnd), ellipticity (Ell) and aspect ratio (Ar), and three characters that do not show significant differences, namely form factor (Ff), circularity (Cir), rectangularity (Rec). The differences in otoliths based on location in front of the Dudepo TPI and in the Lembeh Strait have seven different otolith characters in otolith length (OL), otolith width (OW), otolith area (OA) and otolith perimeter (OP), roundness (Rnd), ellipticity (Ell). and aspect ratio (Ar), and three characters that do not show significant differences, namely form factor (Ff), circularity (Cir), rectangularity (Rec).

 

Keywords: Biometrics, cardinal proud fish, comparison

 

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingkan biometrik otolit ikan kardinal banggai berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan mengetahui perbandingan biometrik otolit pada dua lokasi di Perairan Depan TPI Dudepo Kab. Bolaang Mongondow Selatan dan di Selat Lembeh Kota Bitung. Pengambilan data di lapangan menggunakan metode survei jelajah. Penangkapan ikan dilakukan dengan penyelaman snorkling, penangkapan minimal 50 individu yang mewakili setiap kelas ukuran dengan alat tangkap Chang net/Sibu. Perbedaan otolit pada jenis kelamin jantan dan jenis kelamin betina memiliki tujuh perbedaan karakter otolit pada panjang otolit (OL), lebar otolit (OW), area otolit (OA) dan perimeter otolit (OP), roundness (Rnd), ellipticity (Ell) dan aspect ratio (Ar), dan tiga karakter yang tidak menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan, yaitu form factor (Ff), circularity (Cir), rectangularity (Rec). Perbedaan otolit berdasarkan lokasi di depan TPI Dudepo dan di Selat Lembeh memiliki tujuh perbedaan karakter otolit pada panjang otolit (OL), lebar otolit (OW), area otolit (OA) dan perimeter otolit (OP), roundness (Rnd), ellipticity (Ell) dan aspect ratio (Ar), dan tiga karakter yang tidak menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan, yaitu form factor (Ff), circularity (Cir), rectangularity (Rec).

 

Kata kunci: Biometrik, ikan banggai kardinal, perbandingan

References

Agüera, A. & D. Brophy, 2011. Use of saggital otolith shape analysis to discriminate Northeast Atlantic and Western Mediterranean stocks of Atlantic saury, Scomberesox saurus saurus (Walbaum). Elsevier - Fisheries Research 110 465– 471.

Avigliano, E.; A. Domanico; S. Sánchez and A.V. Volpedo, 2017. Otolith elemental fingerprint and scale and otolith morphometry in Prochilodus lineatus provide identification of natal nurseries. Elsevier - Fisheries Research 186 : 1–10

Bani, A., Poursaeid, S., & Tuset, V. M. 2013. Comparative morphology of the sagittal otolith in three species of south Caspian gobies. Journal of Fish Biology, 82(4), 1321-1332.

Begg, G. A., & Brown, R. W. 2000. Stock identification of haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus on Georges Bank based on otolith shape analysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 129(4), 935-945.

Bose, A. P., Adragna, J. B., & Balshine, S. 2017. Otolith morphology varies between populations, sexes and male alternative reproductive tactics in a vocal toadfish Porichthys notatus. Journal of Fish Biology, 90(1), 311-325.

Bostanci, D., Polat, N., Kurucu, G., Yedier, S., Kontaş, S., & Darçin, M. 2015. Using otolith shape and morphometry to identify four Alburnus species (A. chalcoides, A. escherichii, A. mossulensis and A. tarichi) in Turkish inland waters. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 31(6), 1013-1022.

Burke, N.; D. Brophy & P.A. King, 2008. Shape analysis of otolith annuli in Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus); a new method for tracking fish populations. Elsevier- Fisheries Research 91 133–143.

Campana, S. E., & Casselman, J. M. 1993. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50(5), 1062-1083.

Campana, S. E., & Neilson, J. D. 1985. Microstructure of fish otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42(5), 1014-1032.

Cardinale, M., Doering-Arjes, P., Kastowsky, M., & Mosegaard, H. 2004. Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 61(2), 158-167.

Illahude Delyuzar., Raharjo Purnomo., Wahib Abdul., Mirayosi., Yuningsih Ai., Syahril Moh. Andri., Suprijo Totok., & Lubis Subaktian. 2017 Geologi Selat Lembeh yang Unik dan Mempesona, Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geologi Kelautan (PPPGL). https://mgi.esdm.go.id/content/geologi-selat-lembeh-yang-unik-dan-mempesona Akses 25 Mei 2022 pukul 19.00 WITA

Jawad, L. A., Ambuali, A., Al-Mamry, J. M., & Al-Busaidi, H. K. 2011. Relationships between fish length and otolith length, width and weight of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier, 1817) collected from the Sea of Oman. Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 69(2), 51-61.

Landroit, Y.; C.O. Maolagain & P.L. Horn. 2017. An investigation of otolit shape analysis as a tool to determine stock structure of ling (Genypterus blacodes). New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2017/24. Ministry for Primary Industries, Manatu Ahu Matua, New Zealand Government. Growing and Protecting New Zealand.

Longmore, C.; K. Fogarty; F. Neat; D. Brophy; C. Trueman; A. Milton and S. Mariani, 2010. A comparison of otolith microchemistry and otolith shape analysis for the study of spatial variation in a deep-sea teleost, Coryphaenoides rupestris. Environ Biol Fish 89:591–605.

Me´rigot, B.; Y. Letourneur and R. Lecomte-Finiger, 2007. Characterization of local populations of the common sole Solea solea (Pisces, Soleidae) in the NW Mediterranean through otolith morphometrics and shape analysis. Mar Biol 151:997–1008.

Patty, S. I. 2015. Karakteristik fosfat, nitrat dan oksigen terlarut di perairan selat lembeh, sulawesi utara. Jurnal Pesisir dan Laut Tropis, 3(2), 1-7

Pavlov, D.A., 2016. Differentiation of Three Species of the Genus Upeneus (Mullidae) Based on Otolith Shape Analysis. ournal of Ichthyology. Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 37–51

Pongajouw, O. P., Rondonuwu, A. B., Bataragoa, N. E., Kalesaran, O., Lohoo, A. V., & Salaki, M. S. 2022. Distribution of Size Banggai Fish Cardinal Pterapogon Kauderni Koumans, 1933 in the Front Waters of Dudepo, South Bolaang Mongondow Regency. Jurnal Ilmiah Platax, 10(1), 161-167.

Popper, A. N., & Fay, R. R. 2011. Rethinking sound detection by fishes. Hearing research, 273(1-2), 25-36.

Tuset,V.M., Lombarte,A.,González, J.A., Pertusa, J. F.,& Lorente,M.J. 2003. Comparativemorphology of the sagittal otolith in Serranus spp. Journal of Fish Biology, 63, 1491–1504.

Veron, J. E., Devantier, L. M., Turak, E., Green, A. L., Kininmonth, S., Stafford-Smith, M., & Peterson, N. 2009. Delineating the coral triangle. Galaxea, Journal of Coral Reef Studies, 11(2), 91-100.

Vignon, M. 2012. Ontogenetic trajectories of otolith shape during shift in habitat use: Interaction between otolith growth and environment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 420, 26-32.

Wujdi, A.; M. Agustina dan I. Jatmiko, 2018. Indeks bentuk otolit ikan cakalang, Katsuwonus pelamis (Linnaeus, 1758) dari Samudra Hindia. Jurnal Iktiologi Indonesia, 18(2): 151-163.

Yilmaz, S., Yazicioglu, O., Saygin, S. A., & Polat, N. 2014. Relationships of otolith dimensions with body length of European perch, Perca fluviatilis L., 1758 from Lake Ladik, Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 46(5), 1231-1238.

Zischke, M.T.; L. Litherland; B.R. Tilyard; N.J. Stratford; E.L. Jones and Y.G. Wang, 2016. Otolith morphology of four mackerel species (Scomberomorus spp.) in Australia: Species differentiation and prediction for fisheries monitoring and assessment. Elsevier - Fisheries Research 176: 39–47.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-05

How to Cite

Melani, H., Rondonuwu, A. B., Sangari, J. R., Manginsela, F. B., Pratasik, S. B., & Undap, S. L. (2023). Cardinal Fish Otolith Biometrics Banggai Pterapogon kauderni Koumans, 1933 In the Front Waters of Dudepo TPI Dudepo, South Bolaang Mongondow Regency and in the Lembeh Strait, Bitung City. Jurnal Ilmiah PLATAX, 11(1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.35800/jip.v11i1.44002

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>