GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND IDIOSYNCRATIC RISK

Authors

  • Metta Dewi
  • Yoga Rima Hadi Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Sung Suk Kim Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35794/jmbi.v9i2.39796

Abstract

Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is an asset pricing model that is often used by investors. In CAPM risk comes from two factors, systematic risk and unsystematic risk (idiosyncratic risk). In recent decades the risk of idiosyncratic continues to increase. Although idiosyncratic risk can be eliminated by diversification, several studies have shown that this risk cannot be completely eliminated. This study aims to analyze the effect of institutional ownership, independent board of commissioners, timeliness of financial statements on idiosyncratic risk. The sample of this research is companies engaged in the financial sector consisting of banking companies, insurance companies, securities companies, financing institutions, and others on the IDX in 2013-2018. The result of the analysis shows that the independent board of commissioners has a significant negative effect on idiosyncratic risk. Institutional ownership has a positive effect and timeliness of financial statements has a negative effect, but both are not statistically significant.

References

Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377–397.

https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:31:y:1996:i:03:p:377-397_00

Ammann, M., Oesch, D., Schmid, M., Bruslerie, G., Franke, D., Hoechle, J., Jackwerth, A., Kohler, D., & Mueller, F. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: International evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2010.10.003

Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x

Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1–2), 203–243. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:42:y:2006:i:1-2:p:203-243

Bai, Y., Li, Y.-C., Lin, C.-C., Chen, J.-Y., Chue, C.-M., & Chou, P. (2004). Survey of Stress Reactions Among Health Care Workers Involved With the SARS Outbreak. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.), 55, 1055–1057. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.55.9.1055

Brandt, M., Brav, A., Graham, J., & Kumar, A. (2010). The Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle: Time Trend or Speculative Episodes? Review of Financial Studies, 23, 863–899. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1141219

Chen, H.-M., Lin, C.-H., Kao, T.-C., & Wei, T.-J. (2016). The Effects of Corporate Governance on Idiosyncratic Risk: Evidence from Financial Institutions in Taiwan. Journal of Finance, 4(2), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.15640/jfbm.v4n2a3

Chen, Z., & Petkova, R. (2012). Does Idiosyncratic Volatility Proxy for Risk Exposure? The Review of Financial Studies, 25(9), 2745–2787. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs084

Cheng, S. (2008). Board Size and the Variability of Corporate Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006

Chichernea, D., Holder, A., & Petkevich, A. (2016). Decomposing the accrual premium: The evidence from two markets. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12394

Cremers, M., & NAIR, V. (2005). Governance Mechanism and Equity Prices. Journal of Finance, 60, 2859–2894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00819.x

Datta, S., Iskandar-Datta, M., & Singh, V. (2017). The impact of idiosyncratic risk on accrual management. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 13(1), 70–90. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:ijmfpp:ijmf-01-2016-0013

Erkens, D. H., Hung, M., & Matos, P. (2012). Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 389–411. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:corfin:v:18:y:2012:i:2:p:389-411

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies. The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 55–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05202.x

Ferreira, M. A., & Laux, P. A. (2007). Corporate Governance, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Information Flow. The Journal of Finance, 62(2), 951–989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01228.x

Fu, F. (2009). Idiosyncratic Risk and the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 91, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.02.003

Gadhoum, Y., & Ayadi, M. (2003). Ownership Structure and Risk: A Canadian Empirical Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 42, 19–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/40473362

Gaspar, J., & Massa, M. (2006). Idiosyncratic Volatility and Product Market Competition. The Journal of Business, 79(6), 3125–3152. https://doi.org/10.1086/505251

Gunarsih, T. (2003). Struktur kepemilikan sebagai salah satu mekanisme corporate governance. Kompak (8).

Himmelberg, C., Hubbard, R. G., & Palia, D. (1999). Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and Link Between Ownership and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 353–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00025-2

Jin, L., & Myers, S. C. (2006a). R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 257–292.

https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:79:y:2006:i:2:p:257-292

Kılıç Karamahmutoğlu, M., & Kuzey, C. (2016). The effect of board gender diversity on firm performance: evidence from Turkey. Gender in Management, 31, 434–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-10-2015-0088

Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259–275.

https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:93:y:2009:i:2:p:259-275

Nguyen, P. (2011). Corporate governance and risk-taking: Evidence from Japanese firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19(3), 278–297.

https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:19:y:2011:i:3:p:278-297

Tulung, J. E., & Ramdani, D. (2018). Independence, size and performance of the board: An emerging market research. Corporate Ownership & Control, 15(2-1), 201-208.

Tulung, J. E., & Ramdani, D. (2015). The Influence of Top Management Team Characteristics on BPD Performance. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 8(3), 155-166.

Tulung, J. E., Saerang, I. S., & Pandia, S. (2018). The influence of corporate governance on the intellectual capital disclosure: a study on Indonesian private banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 13(4), 61-72.

Wright, P., Kroll, M., & Elenkov, D. (2002). Acquisition Returns, Increase in Firm Size, and Chief Executive Officer Compensation: The Moderating Role of Monitoring. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069384

Yuniyanti, M., Topowijono, P., & Sulasmiyati, S. (2016). Pengaruh Struktur Modal, Struktur Kepemilikan dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Sektor Industri Dasar dan Kimia yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2011-2014. In Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB)|Vol (Vol. 35, Issue 1).

Downloads

Published

2022-10-22

How to Cite

Dewi, M., Hadi, Y. R., & Kim, S. S. (2022). GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND IDIOSYNCRATIC RISK. JMBI UNSRAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis Dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi)., 9(2), 917–931. https://doi.org/10.35794/jmbi.v9i2.39796

Most read articles by the same author(s)