AMPK as a Bioenergetic Checkpoint in Neurons: Conditional Permission for Synaptic Plasticity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35799/jbl.v15i3.65833Keywords:
AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), Synaptic plasticity, Bioenergetic checkpoint, Long-term potentiation (LTP), Plasticity permissionAbstract
Synaptic signaling and plasticity require a lot of energy. Those two pathways occurance differ based on energy availability. Synaptic signaling can occur rapidly but plasticity depends on sustained energy availability. This makes neurons need to assess whether sufficient energy is present to support plasticity. Adenosine monophosphate–activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a central cellular energy sensor, yet its role in determining the energetic permissibility of synaptic plasticity has not been clearly defined. This review proposes a conceptual framework in which AMPK functions as a bioenergetic checkpoint for synaptic plasticity. Evidence indicates that AMPK activity is tightly coupled to cellular energy status. Under high-energy conditions, low AMP and high ATP levels limit AMP binding to the γ subunit. This makes the β subunit remains non-myristoylated and the α subunit unphosphorylated thus maintaining AMPK in an inactive state. This results in permitted synaptic plasticity. During low energy condition, elevated AMP and reduced ATP promote AMP binding to the γ subunit. The binding then induce myristoylationn of β-subunit and phosphorylation of the α subunit at threonine 172 (Thr172). This cascade activate AMPK. Activated AMPK suppresses energy-consuming processes, thereby restricting synaptic plasticity. Through these mechanisms, AMPK converts fluctuations in cellular energy into a threshold-based decision that determines whether synaptic activity is permitted toward long-term plasticity in preserving bioenergetic homeostasis. This framework positions AMPK as a central bioenergetic checkpoint linking cellular energy status to the permission of synaptic plasticity.
References
Dastidar, S. G., Sharma, S. Das, Chakraborty, S., Chattarji, S., Bhattacharya, A., & Muddashetty, R. S. (2020). Distinct Regulation of Bioenergetics and Translation by Group I mGluR and NMDAR. EMBO Reports, 21(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948037
Divakaruni, S. S., Dyke, A. M. Van, Chandra, R., LeGates, T. A., Contreras, M., Dharmasri, P. A., Higgs, H. N., Lobo, M. K., Thompson, S. M., & Blanpied, T. A. (2018). Long-term Potentiation Requires a Rapid Burst of Dendritic Mitochondrial Fission during Induction. Neuron, 100(4), 860–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.025
Gu, X., Yan, Y., Novick, S. J., Kovach, A., Goswami, D., Ke, J., Tan, M. H. E., Wang, L., Li, X., De Waal, P. W., Webb, M. R., Griffin, P. R., Xu, H. E., & Melcher, K. (2017). Deconvoluting AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) adenine nucleotide binding and sensing. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 292(30), 12653–12666. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M117.793018
Hawley, S. A., Russell, F. M., & Grahame Hardie, D. (2024). AMP-activated protein kinase can be allosterically activated by ADP but AMP remains the key activating ligand. Biochemical Journal, 481(8), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20240082
Herculano-Houzel, S. (2011). Scaling of brain metabolism with a fixed energy budget per neuron: Implications for neuronal activity, plasticity and evolution. PLoS ONE, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017514
Leung, A., & Rangamani, P. (2023). Computational modeling of AMPK and mTOR crosstalk in glutamatergic synapse calcium signaling. Npj Systems Biology and Applications, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-023-00295-4
Li, H. L., & van Rossum, M. C. W. (2020). Energy efficient synaptic plasticity. ELife, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50804
Li, X., Wang, L., Zhou, X. E., Ke, J., De Waal, P. W., Gu, X., Tan, M. H. E., Wang, D., Wu, D., Xu, H. E., & Melcher, K. (2015). Structural basis of AMPK regulation by adenine nucleotides and glycogen. Cell Research, 25(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2014.150
Marinangeli, C., Didier, S., Ahmed, T., Caillerez, R., Domise, M., Laloux, C., Bégard, S., Carrier, S., Colin, M., Marchetti, P., Ghesquière, B., Balschun, D., Buée, L., Kluza, J., & Vingtdeux, V. (2018). AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Is Essential for the Maintenance of Energy Levels during Synaptic Activation. IScience, 9, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2018.10.006
Oakhill, J. S., Chen, Z. P., Scott, J. W., Steel, R., Castelli, L. A., Linga, N., Macaulay, S. L., & Kemp, B. E. (2010). β-Subunit myristoylation is the gatekeeper for initiating metabolic stress sensing by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(45), 19237–19241. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009705107
Potter, W. B., O’Riordan, K. J., Barnett, D., Osting, S. M. K., Wagoner, M., Burger, C., & Roopra, A. (2010). Metabolic regulation of neuronal plasticity by the energy sensor AMPK. PLoS ONE, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008996
Sample, V., Ramamurthy, S., Gorshkov, K., Ronnett, G. V., & Zhang, J. (2015). Polarized activities of AMPK and BRSK in primary hippocampal neurons. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 26(10), 1935–1946. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-02-0764
Scott, J. W., Ross, F. A., Liu, J. K. D., & Hardie, D. G. (2007). Regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase by a pseudosubstrate sequence on the γ subunit. EMBO Journal, 26(3), 806–815. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601542
Swift, N. A., Yang, Q., Jester, H. M., Zhou, X., Manuel, A., Kemp, B. E., Steinberg, G. R., & Ma, T. (2024). Suppression of neuronal AMPKβ2 isoform impairs recognition memory and synaptic plasticity. Neurobiology of Disease, 201(September), 106664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106664
Tao, W., Lee, J., Chen, X., Diaz-Alonso, J., Zhou, J., Pleasure, S., & Nicoll, R. A. (2021). Synaptic memory requires camkii. ELife, 10, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60360
Wang, M., Jin, B., & Jo, J. (2025). Acute Restraint Stress Induces Long-Lasting Synaptic Enhancement by Inhibiting AMPK Activation in AD Model Mice. CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics, 31(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.70335
Willows, R., Sanders, M. J., Xiao, B., Patel, B. R., Martin, S. R., Read, J., Wilson, J. R., Hubbard, J., Gamblin, S. J., & Carling, D. (2017). Phosphorylation of AMPK by upstream kinases is required for activity in mammalian cells. Biochemical Journal, 474(17), 3059–3073. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20170458
Wilson, D. F., & Matschinsky, F. M. (2022). Integration of Eukaryotic Energy Metabolism: The Intramitochondrial and Cytosolic Energy States ([ATP]f/[ADP]f[Pi]). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105550
Yang, A. J. T., Mohammad, A., Tsiani, E., Necakov, A., & MacPherson, R. E. K. (2022). Chronic AMPK Activation Reduces the Expression and Alters Distribution of Synaptic Proteins in Neuronal SH-SY5Y Cells. Cells, 11(15), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11152354
Yang, W., Zhou, X., Zimmermann, H. R., & Ma, T. (2021). Brain-specific suppression of AMPKα2 isoform impairs cognition and hippocampal LTP by PERK-mediated eIF2α phosphorylation. Molecular Psychiatry, 26(6), 1880–1897. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0739-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gracia Alice Victoria Pollo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
