
CHEMISTRY PROGRESS Terakreditasi Peringkat 4
CHEMISTRY PROGRESS recognizes post-publication discussion as an important part of the scientific process. The journal encourages constructive scientific dialogue, critical evaluation, and the exchange of ideas to improve the quality, reliability, and impact of published research.
Post-publication discussion provides an opportunity for readers, researchers, and other members of the scientific community to comment on, clarify, or critically evaluate articles published in CHEMISTRY PROGRESS. Discussions may address the scientific validity, methodology, interpretation of results, originality, reproducibility, or broader implications of published research.
All contributions must be relevant to the published article and supported by appropriate scientific reasoning or verifiable evidence.
Readers who wish to comment on a published article may submit their comments to the editorial office of CHEMISTRY PROGRESS through the journal's official communication channels.
Submissions should clearly identify the article being discussed, provide specific and evidence-based observations, and include relevant references or supporting information where appropriate. The journal may invite the original authors to respond to substantive comments concerning their work.
Authors are encouraged to respond professionally and constructively to legitimate scientific criticism. Both comments and responses should focus on scientific issues rather than personal opinions or disputes.
All submitted comments and responses are subject to editorial assessment before publication. The editorial team evaluates their relevance, scientific merit, clarity, factual accuracy, and compliance with the journal's publication ethics policies.
Where necessary, the editor may seek independent expert advice or peer review to assess the validity of the issues raised. The journal reserves the right to request revisions or decline submissions that lack sufficient scientific merit, contain unsupported allegations, are irrelevant to the published work, or violate ethical standards.
If a post-publication discussion identifies a potential error, significant omission, ethical concern, or issue that may affect the reliability of a published article, CHEMISTRY PROGRESS will assess the matter in accordance with its editorial policies and recognized publication ethics principles.
Depending on the findings, the journal may publish a correction, an expression of concern, or a retraction, as appropriate. Allegations of research misconduct will be handled in accordance with the journal's policy on allegations of research misconduct.
All participants in post-publication discussions must adhere to principles of academic integrity, fairness, respect, and transparency. Comments must not contain defamatory statements, discriminatory language, personal attacks, or allegations presented as established facts without adequate evidence.
Authors, commenters, and other participants must disclose relevant competing interests that could influence their contributions. Confidential information and personal data must be handled appropriately.
Editorial decisions regarding post-publication comments and responses will be based on scientific merit, relevance, evidence, and ethical considerations. The journal aims to ensure that legitimate scientific criticism can be considered fairly without undue influence from personal, institutional, or commercial interests.
Where comments or responses are published, they may be linked to the original article to facilitate scholarly discussion and maintain a transparent scientific record.
CHEMISTRY PROGRESS is committed to fostering an open, respectful, and evidence-based scholarly environment in which published research can be examined, discussed, and improved through continued scientific engagement.

CHEMISTRY PROGRESS Terakreditasi Peringkat 4